期刊文献+

荣昌猪和杜洛克猪肉质及营养价值的比较分析 被引量:31

Comparative Analysis of Meat Quality and Nutritive Value between Rongchang and Duroc Pigs
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以脂肪型的荣昌猪和瘦肉型的杜洛克猪为研究对象,比较分析2个品种之间背最长肌的肉质、氨基酸、脂肪酸和微量元素含量差异。结果显示:荣昌猪的肌内脂肪含量、肉色和大理石纹显著高于杜洛克猪(P<0.05),剪切力显著低于杜洛克猪(P<0.05);荣昌猪背最长肌中丝氨酸、丙氨酸、精氨酸、异亮氨酸、酪氨酸、总氨基酸含量和呈味氨基酸总量显著高于杜洛克猪(P<0.05);荣昌猪背最长肌的饱和脂肪酸含量显著低于杜洛克猪(P<0.05);单不饱和脂肪酸含量显著高于杜洛克猪(P<0.05);荣昌猪背最长肌中微量元素Co、Mn、Cr、Se和Zn含量均显著高于杜洛克猪(P<0.05),微量元素As和Mo含量显著低于杜洛克猪(P<0.05)。结果表明,脂肪型的荣昌猪在肉质及营养价值方面总体优于瘦肉型的杜洛克猪,为中国地方猪种遗传资源的保护及开发利用提供了理论依据。 The aim of the present study was to investigate the difference in meat quality traits and the contents of amino acids, fatty acids and microelements of longissimus dorsi muscle between the genetically lean Duroc and obese Rongchang pigs. The results showed that longissimus dorsi muscle from Rongchang pigs had a significantly higher intramuscular fat content, meat colour and marbling and significantly lower shear force than that from Duroc pigs (P 〈 0.05). Rongchang pigs showed significantly higher contents of alanine, arginine, isoleucine, tyrosine, total amino acid and flavor amino acids than Duroc pigs (P 〈 0.05). Rongchang pigs showed significantly lower contents of saturated fatty acids and higher monounsaturated fatty acids than Duroc pigs (P 〈 0.05). Rongchang pigs also exhibited significantly higher contents of microelements including Co, Mn, Cr, Se and Zn but lower contents of As and Mo than Duroc pigs (P 〈 0.05). These results indicate that Rongchang pigs have better meat quality and nutritive value than Duroc pigs in general, providing a theoretical basis for the protection and exploitation of local pig genetic resources in China.
出处 《食品科学》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第24期127-130,共4页 Food Science
基金 中央高校基本科研业务费专项(SWU114059)
关键词 肉质 氨基酸 脂肪酸 微量元素 pig meat quality amino acid fatty acid microelement
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

  • 1MOELLER S, CRESPO L. Overview of world swine and pork production[J]. Agricultural Sciences, 2009, 1: 195-208.
  • 2MILLER E, ULLREY D. The pig as a model for human nutrition[J]. Annual Review of Nutrition, 1987, 7(1): 361-382.
  • 3Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). Animal production and health[EB/OL]. (2013-11-21) [2015-05-13]. http://www.fao.org/ag/ a gainfo/theme s/o en(,pig_s/production.html.,.
  • 4李明洲,李学伟,朱砺,滕晓坤,肖华胜,李强,陈磊.猪背最长肌中肌肉生长和脂肪沉积相关基因的差异表达和主成分分析[J].中国生物化学与分子生物学报,2008,24(1):46-54. 被引量:9
  • 5樊庆鲁,卢士玲,李开雄.影响猪肉品质的因素[J].中国食物与营养,2005,11(4):29-32. 被引量:3
  • 6国家质量监督检验检疫总局.GB/T9695.5-2008肉与肉制品:pH测定[s].北京:中国标准出版社,2008.
  • 7国家质量监督检验检疫总局.GB5009.5-2010食品中蛋白质的测定[M].北京:中国标准出版社,2010.
  • 8FRANCO D, VAZQUEZ J A, LORENZO J M. Growth performance, carcass and meat quality of the Celta pig crossbred with Duroc and Landrance genotypes[J]. Meat Science, 2014, 96(1): 195-202.
  • 9LEI Huaigang, SHEN Linyuan, ZHANG Shunhua, et al. Comparison of the meat quality, post-mortem muscle energy metabolism, and the expression of glycogen synthesis-related genes in three pig crossbreeds[J]. Animal Production Science, 2014, 55(4): 501-507.
  • 10国家质量监督检验检疫总局.GB/T9695.2-2008肉与肉制品:脂肪酸测定[M].北京:中国标准出版社,2008.

二级参考文献299

共引文献184

同被引文献386

引证文献31

二级引证文献156

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部