期刊文献+

次大国:概念、二重性与国际体系 被引量:7

Secondary States:Conceptual Frame,Duality and the International System
原文传递
导出
摘要 综合国力和关键项是界定次大国的基本要素,构成了次大国发挥作用的内在因素。综合国力较强(不如大国,优于中等国家)、关键项存在缺陷是次大国的共同特征。次大国的二重性主要表现在次大国的大国雄心与小国行为并存:大国雄心是指成为全球性大国的志向,小国行为表现为搭便车和追随大国等方面。此外,次大国的概念在不同的时代背景下有着不同的意义,并非固定不变,因此,国际体系构成了次大国二重性的外部因素。在当今时代背景下,因全球化、多极化发展,次大国的作用和地位凸显,其二重性也因此得以更加充分地在国际舞台上展现。 Comprehensive national power and normative role are the basic factors which define a secondary state,and which shape the roles that secondary states can play.Secondary states generally have relatively strong comprehensive national power(not as powerful as great states,but stronger than medium states),but face shortcomings with respect to normative roles.The duality of secondary states comes in the fact that they have great power ambitions,while their mode of behavior is similar to that of small states.By great power ambitions,we mean that they aspire to become a global power;by saying that they follow the behavior of small states,we mean that they practice free riding and align closely with great powers.In addition,the concept of the secondary state takes on different meanings during different historical periods,and is by no means static.As such,the international system features a duality vis-a-vis external factors when it comes to secondary states.Within the contemporary international context of globalization and development towards a multipolar system,the role and importance of secondary states is especially evident,and the duality of such states is much more apparent on the international stage.
作者 郭海龙 孙晶
出处 《南亚研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第4期15-32,153-154,共18页 South Asian Studies
关键词 次大国 国际体系 印度 综合国力 搭便车 追随 大国 Secondary State International System India Comprehensive National Power Free Riding/bandwagon Following Great Powers
  • 相关文献

参考文献34

  • 1Robert O. Keohane, " Lilliputians' Dilemma: Small States in International Politics," International Organization, Vol. XXIII, Spring 1969, pp. 295-296.
  • 2[美]肯尼思·沃尔兹.《国际政治理论》,胡少华等译,北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,1992年,第3页.
  • 3Randall L Schweller, " Tripolarity and the Second World War," International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 37, No. 1, March 1993, p. 86.
  • 4Giulio M. Gallarotti, " Hegemons of a Lesser God: The Bank of France and Monetary Leadership under the Classical Gold Standard," Review of International Political Economy, Vol. 12, No. 4, Oct. 2005, p. 626.
  • 5王玲.关于综合国力的测度[J].世界经济与政治,2006(6):45-51. 被引量:24
  • 6王玲.《世界主要大国综合国力比较》,收入李慎明,王逸舟.《2006年:全球政治与安全报告》,社会科学文献出版社2006年版,第240-268页.
  • 7唐彦林,吴志焜.世界主要国家综合国力分析——基于SPSS数理统计分析[J].改革与战略,2014,30(8):28-31. 被引量:6
  • 8郑捷.如何定义“大国”?[J].统计研究,2007,24(10):61-63. 被引量:17
  • 9[美]米尔斯海默.《大国政治的悲剧》(王义桅、唐小松译),上海人民出版社,2003年版,第506~565页.
  • 10张骥.《法德关系与欧洲权力结构失衡》,载《东方早报》,2013年4月25日第A22版.

二级参考文献127

共引文献80

同被引文献82

二级引证文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部