期刊文献+

消化道逆环境对长双歧杆菌的存活及黏附力的影响

Effect of digestive tract stress on survival and adhesion ability of Bifidobacterium longum
原文传递
导出
摘要 长双歧杆菌LPL-1来源于中国长寿老人肠道,具有潜在的益生功效。为评价其应用潜力,研究探讨了长双歧杆菌LPL-1经历消化道逆环境后的存活及黏附性能。以单独及连续的消化道逆境处理双歧杆菌,以活菌数代表其存活能力,以黏附于结肠上皮癌细胞HT-29的菌数代表其黏附力。研究结果表明:胃酸溶液、胃蛋白酶、胆盐及胰蛋白酶单独处理后,初始9 log cfu/m L的双歧杆菌活菌数分别降低至7.2、6.1、7.1、7.1 log cfu/m L;口腔-食道到胃-十二指肠-回肠的连续逆境处理后,双歧杆菌的存活数量为3.1 log cfu/m L。胃酸溶液、胃蛋白酶、胆盐及胰蛋白酶单独处理后,初始9 log cfu/m L的双歧杆菌黏附于HT-29细胞的数量从67个/50个细胞降低到65.4、42.5、57.6、50.7个/50个细胞;连续消化道逆境处理后为14.1个/50个细胞。研究的结果证明了长双歧杆菌LPL-1有较强的消化道逆境耐受力,有开发为益生菌制剂的潜力。 Bifidobacterium longum LPL-1,isolated from Chinese centenarians faeces,are potential probiotic.The present study evaluated the survival and adhesion ability of B.longum LPL-1 under the stress of digestive tract.The viable account and adhesion number of B.longum LPL-1 after individual or successive stress were analyzed,as the indicator of survival and adhesion ability respectively.The results showed that:the viable count of B.longum LPL-1 decreased from 9 log cfu/m L to 7.2,6.1,7.1,7.1 log cfu/m L after gastric acid,pepsin,bile salt,trypsin treatment respectively,and to 3.1 log cfu/m L after successive digestive tract stress.On the other hand,the adhesion number of B.longum LPL-1 decreased from 67/50 cells to 65.4,42.5,57.6,50.7/50 cells after gastric acid,pepsin,bile salt,trypsin treatment respectively,and to 14.1/50 cells after successive stress.The results of the study proved that B.longum LPL-1 had strong tolerance to the stress of digestive tract,which had great application potential in probiotic products.
出处 《食品科技》 CAS 北大核心 2015年第12期24-30,共7页 Food Science and Technology
基金 国家大学生创新项目(201510019080) 国家自然科学基金面上项目(31271827)
关键词 双歧杆菌 存活 黏附 消化道 Bifidobacterium survival adhesion digestive tract
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1S a nchez B, Ruiz L, Gueimonde M, et al. Adaptation of bifidobacteria to the gastrointestinal tract and functional consequences[J]. PHarmacological Research,2013,69(1): 127-136.
  • 2Tuohy K M, Probert H M, Smejkal C W, et al. Using probiotics and prebiotics to improve gut health[J]. Drug Discov Today,2003,8(15):692-700.
  • 3刘玉荣,李晓鸥,李东胜,杨翔华,张巍,洪新.双歧杆菌口服液的研制[J].食品研究与开发,2003,24(6):81-83. 被引量:4
  • 4Champagne C P, Green-Johnson J, Raymond Y, et al. Selection of probiotie bacteria for the fermentation of a soy beverage in combination with Streptococcus thermopHilus. Food Research International,2009,42(5-6):612-621.
  • 5刘吉成,王惠艳,刘伯阳.双歧杆菌模拟胃肠环境中抗性的研究[J].中国微生态学杂志,2003,15(3):147-147. 被引量:12
  • 6DE LOS REYES-GAV1L N C G, SU REZ A, FERN NDEZ- GARC A M, et al. Adhesion of bile-adapted Bifidobacterium strains to the HT29-MTX cell line is modified after sequential gastrointestinal challenge simulated in vitro using human gastric and duodenal juices [J]. Research in Microbiology,2011,162(5):514-9.
  • 7SERAFINI F, STRATI F, RUAS-MADIEDO P, et al. Evaluation of adhesion properties and antibacterial activities of the infant gut commensal Bifidobacteriumbifidum PRL2010[J].Anaerobe,2013,21 (0):9-17.
  • 8王丽群,张佰荣,王彦,尚玉琳,孟祥晨.双歧杆菌体外对Caco-2的黏附及其表面性质分析[J].微生物学报,2010,50(5):606-613. 被引量:11
  • 9韦云路,张丽末,唐虞木子,郭秀锋,王洋,李平兰.动物双歧RH发酵雪莲果胡萝卜复合饮料的研制[J].食品科技,2014,39(12):121-127. 被引量:3
  • 10Chou C C, Lo P R, Huang E C, et al. Determinations of the antimutagenic activities of several probiotic bifidobaeteria under acidic and bile conditions against benzo[a]pyrene by a modified Ames test.[J]. International Journal of Food Microbiology,2OM,93(2):249-257.

二级参考文献67

  • 1顾瑞霞,谭东兴,郭久和,赵淑萍.胆汁酸盐和低pH值对乳酸菌活性的影响[J].微生物学通报,1996,23(3):144-146. 被引量:40
  • 2王占武,张.双歧杆菌与人体健康[J].中国乳品工业,1996,24(1):24-27. 被引量:47
  • 3诸葛健 王正祥.工业微生物实验技术手册[M].中国轻工业出版社,1997..
  • 4Collado MC, Meriluoto J, Salminen S. In vitro analysis of probiotic strain combinations to inhibit pathogen adhesion to human intestinal mucus. Food Research International, 2007, 40: 629-636.
  • 5Bernet MF, Brassart D, Neeser JR, Servin AL. Adhesion of human bifidobacterial strains to cultured human intestinal epithelial ceils and inhibition of enteropathogen-cell interactions. Applied Environmental Microbiology, 1993, 59(12) : 4121-4128.
  • 6Candela M, Perna F, Carnevali P, Vitali B, Ciati R, Gionchetti P, Rizzello, Campieri, Brigidi P. Interaction of probiotic Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains with human intestinal epithelial cells: adhesion properties, competition against enteropathogens and modulation of IL-8 production. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 2008, 125: 286-292.
  • 7Kos B, Suskovic J, Vukovic S, . Simpraga M, Frece J, Matosic. Adhesion and aggregation ability of probiotic strain Lactobacillus acidophilus M92. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 2003, 94(6): 981-987.
  • 8Mobili P, Serradell MA., Trejo SA, Puigvert FA, Abraham AG, Antoni GL. Heterogeneity of S-layer proteins from aggregating and non-aggregating Lactobacillus kefir strains. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek, 2009, 95(4) : 363-372.
  • 9Crociani J, Grill JP, Huppert M, Ballongue J. Adhesion of different bifidobacteria strains to human enterocyte-like Caco-2 cells and comparison with in vivo study. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 1995, 21 (3) : 146-148.
  • 10Del RB, Sgorbati B, Miglioli M, Palenzona D. Adhesion, autoaggregation and hydrophobicity of 13 strains of Bifidobacterium longum. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 2000, 31 (6) : 438-442.

共引文献134

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部