期刊文献+

高场MRI多序列联合检查对胰腺癌分期的应用价值 被引量:1

Value of MRI with Multi-Sequence in Preoperative Staging of Pancreatic Cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨MRI多序列联合检查在胰腺癌术前分期的临床应用价值。方法:回顾性分析25例经手术及病理证实的胰腺癌患者的MRI表现,并与手术及病理结果进行对照。所有患者进行T1WI、T2WI、MRCP以及多期动态增强序列检查。结果:I期患者4例,Ⅱ患者12例,III期患者7例,IV期患者2例。胰腺癌Ⅱ期、III期诊断的灵敏性、特异性、准确率、阳性预测值与阴性预测值分别为91.7%与85.7%、92.3%与94.4%、92.0%与92.0%、91.7%与85.7%、92.3%与94.4%。MRI术前分期与术中及病理有较好的一致性(k=0.841),分期准确率为88.0%。结论:MRI、MRCP联合多期动态增强序列检查在胰腺癌的诊断及分期方面具有重要的临床意义。 Purpose: To explore the value of MR/with multi-sequence in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Method: MR/data of 25 patients with pathologically confirmed pancreatic cancers were retrospectively analyzed and compared to the operation and pathological findings. T1WI, T2WI, MRCP and multi-phase dynamic enhancement were performed. Results: Based on MR/images, the tumor was divided into stage Ⅰ (4 cases), stage Ⅱ (12 cases), stage Ⅲ(7 cases), and stage IV (2 cases). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of MR/assessment for preoperative staging of pancreatic cancer were 91.7%, 92.3%, 92.0%, 91.7%, 92.3% for stage Ⅱ , and 85.7%, 94.4%, 92.0%, 85.7%, 94.4% for stage Ⅲ.There was a good consistency between MR/assessment and pathological findings (k value=0.841). The accuracy rate of MR/assessment for preoperative staging of pancreatic cancer was 88.0%. Conclusion: MR/with MRCP and multi-phase dynamic enhancement has considerable value in preoperative staging of pancreatic cancer.
出处 《中国医学计算机成像杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2015年第6期538-542,共5页 Chinese Computed Medical Imaging
关键词 磁共振成像 胰腺肿瘤 肿瘤分期 Magnetic resonance imaging Pancreatic neoplasms Neoplasm staging
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献196

  • 1杨小庆,杨爱玲,杨明,高修成.双管征与四管征在磁共振胰胆管成像中的诊断价值[J].中国医学影像技术,2007,23(6):874-876. 被引量:11
  • 2刘彤华.胰腺肿瘤的病理学研究进展[J].中华病理学杂志,1995,24:221-223.
  • 3Hamilton SR, Aaltonen LA, (eds) . World Health Organization classification of turnouts, pathology , genetics of tumours of digestive system. Lyon: IARC Press, 2000:200-251
  • 4Kloppel G. Pancreatic , non- endocrine tumours. In: Kloppel G, Heitz PH, eds. Pancreatic pathology. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1984: 79- 113
  • 5Prokesch RW, Chow LC, Beaulieu CF, et al. Isoattenuating pancreatic adenocarcinoma at multi - detector row CT: secondary signs. Radiology, 2002,224:764 - 768
  • 6Parbin DM, Whelan SL, Ferlay J, et al. Cancer incidence in five continents. Lyon: IARC Press, 2000
  • 7Kloppel G, Maillet B. Pathology of pancreatic exocrine tumors. In: Beger HG, Warshaw AL, Buchler MW, et al. The pancreas. Malden MA, USA: Blackwell Science, 1998: 928-942
  • 8Lu DSK, Vedantham S, Krasny RM, et al. Two- phase helical CT for pancreatic tumors: pancreatic versus hepatic phase enhancement of tumor, pancreas and vascular structures. Radiology, 1996,199:697- 701
  • 9Boland GW, O' Malley ME, Saez M, et al. Pancreatic - phase versus portal vein - phase helical CT of the pancreas: optimal temporal window for evaluation of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. AJR, 1999,172: 605- 608
  • 10McNulty N J, Francis IR, Platt JF, et al. Multi- -detector row helical CT of the pancreas: effect of contrast - enhanced multiphasic imaging on enhancement of the pancreas, peripancreatic vasculature, and pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Radiology, 2001, 220: 97- 102

共引文献57

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部