期刊文献+

歼击机模拟作战飞行任务中的情境意识测量与比较:基于眼动的证据 被引量:6

Measurement and Comparison of Situation Awareness in Air Combat Environment: Evidence from Eye Movement
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的考察飞行员被试和对照组被试在歼击机模拟作战飞行任务中主观情境意识和心理负荷,与此同时检测两组被试的眼动差异,并在此基础上讨论构建测量情境意识过程的眼动技术的可能性。方法研究采用单因素被试间实验设计,要求对照组被试、飞行员被试参与击落靶子飞机任务。结果 (1)飞行员被试在主观情境意识上测量显著高于对照组被试。在主观负荷程度显著低于对照组被试。(2)眼动数据显示,舱外内的平均注视时间、总注视时间、注视次数和平均浏览时间上存在组间差异。结论眼动技术可以用来测量情境意识过程,其中平均注视时间可用来衡量知觉层面上的情境意识过程,总注视时间、注视次数和平均浏览时间则可衡量理解层面上的情境意识过程。然而,构建情境意识过程的眼动技术测量仍需后续大量研究。 Objective To explore differences of situation awareness and mental workload between novice and expert pilots. Methods 15 subjects ( 10 expert pilots and 5 novice pilots) were involved in the tasks of hunting a target aircraft;their eye movement pattern were tracked at same time. Results ( 1 ) the scores of expert pilots were higher than those of novice pilots on the two questionnaires of Situational Awareness Rating Technique and NASA - Task Load Index. (2) There were also significant difference between noviee and expert pilots on eye movement index, such as mean fixation duration, total fixation time, fixation number and mean glance time. Conclusion eye movement tracking technique can be used to measure situation awareness, mean fixation duration can be used to measure percep- tion of situation awareness,and total fixation time, fixation number and mean glance time can be used to measure the comprehension of situation awareness. However, it is still a long way to go for building a measurement of Situational Awareness with eye movement traeking technique.
出处 《人类工效学》 2015年第6期17-21,共5页 Chinese Journal of Ergonomics
基金 空后勤课题(DKJ09L036)
关键词 飞行员 情境意识 心理负荷 眼动 航空心理学 认知工程 pilots situation awareness mental workload eye movements aviation psychology cognitive engineering
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Rayner K. Eye Movements in Reading and Information Processing: 20 Years of Research [ J ]. Psychological Bulletin, 1998,124 (3) : 372 - 422.
  • 2Rayner K, Juhasz BJ. Eye Movements in Reading:Old Questions and New Directions [ J ]. European Journalof Cognitive Psychology,2004,16 ( 1 ) :340 - 352.
  • 3Catherwood D, Edgar GK, Sallis G, et al. Fire Alarm or False Alarm? Decision - making "Bias" of Firefighters in Training Exercises [ J ]. International Journal of E- mergency Services,2012,1 (2) :135 -158.
  • 4Klein G, Calderwood R, Clinton Cirocco A. Rapid De- cision Making on the Fire Ground:The Original Study Plusa Postscript [ J 1. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making,2010,4 ( 3 ) : 186 - 209.
  • 5Schulz CM, Endsley MR, Kochs EF, et al. Situation Awareness in Anaesthesia: Concept and Research [ J ]. Anesthesiology,2013,118 ( 3 ) :729 - 742.
  • 6Endsley MR. Toward A Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems [ J ]. Human Factors, 1995,37 (1) :32 -64.
  • 7Endsley MR. Measurement of Situation Awareness in Dy- namic' Systems [ J ]. Human Factors, 1995, 37 ( 1 ) : 65-84.
  • 8Endsley MR. Situation Awareness Misconceptions and Misunderstandings [J]. Journal of Cognitive Engineer- ing and Decision Making,2015,9 ( 1 ) :4 - 32.
  • 9Endsley MR. Final Reflections: Situation Awareness Models and Measures [ J ]. Journal of Cognitive Engi- neering and Decision Making,2015,9 ( 1 ) : 101 - 111.
  • 10Catherwood D, Edgar GK, Nikolla D, et al. Mapping Brain Activity During Loss of Situation Awareness : An EEG Investigation of A Basis for Top - down Influence on Perception [ J ]. Human Factors, 2014,56 ( 8 ) : 1428 - 1452.

二级参考文献9

  • 1杨家忠,张侃.情境意识的理论模型、测量及其应用[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(6):842-850. 被引量:43
  • 2杨家忠,张侃.数据-笔墨比率对过程监控任务绩效的影响[J].心理科学,2005,28(2):264-268. 被引量:3
  • 3Seamster T L, Redding R E, Cannon J R, et al. Cognitive Task Analysis of Expertise in Air Traffic Control [ J ]. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 1993, 3(4): 257-283.
  • 4Durso F T, Hackworth C A, Truitt T R, et al. Situation Awareness as a Predictor of Performance in En Route Air Traffic Controllers ( DOT/FAA/AM - 97/ 13) [ R]. Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration, 1999.
  • 5Durso F T, Gronlund S D. Situation Awareness [ K]. In: Durso F T, Nickerson R S, Schvaneveldt RW, et al, eds. The Handbook of Applied Cognition. New York : Wiley, 1999:283 - 314.
  • 6Endsley M R, Sollenberger R L, Nakata A, et al. Situation Awareness in Air Traffic Control: Enhanced Displays for Advanced Operations (DOT/.FAA/CT - TNO0/01 ) [ R]. Atlantic City, NJ: Federal Aviation Administration William J. Hughes Technical Center, 2000.
  • 7Endsley M R, Bolstad C A. Individual Differences in Pilot Situation Awareness [ J]. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 1994,4(3 ) : 241 - 264.
  • 8Vidulieh M A. Testing the Sensitivity of Situation Awareness Metrics in Interface Evaluations[ M ]. In: Tsang P, Vidulich M A, Principles and Practices of Aviation Psychology. Mahwah, N J: Erlbaum, 2003. 227 - 246.
  • 9Endsley M R. Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems [ J]. Human Factors, 1995, 37 (1),32-64.

共引文献11

同被引文献48

引证文献6

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部