期刊文献+

3D和2D高清腹腔镜技术在肾脏切除术中的应用比较 被引量:2

Comparison of 3D and 2D HD laparoscopic technique in the kidney resection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较3D和2D高清腹腔镜技术在肾脏切除术中的应用效果。方法采用Storz 3D高清腹腔镜技术完成肾脏切除术32例(观察组),回顾性分析并与2013年1月-2013年12月采用Storz 2D高清腹腔镜技术完成肾脏切除术37例(对照组),记录手术时间、术中出血量、并发症、术后引流量、术后拔除引流管时间、术后住院时间和住院费用等,并进行统计学分析。结果观察组32例和对照组37例均顺利完成手术。前后两组手术时间为(124.41±52.90)和(149.00±33.68)min,术中出血量为(104.62±57.69)和(136.89±57.92)ml,组间比较差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05);两组术后引流量、术后拔除引流管时间、术后住院时间和住院总费用分别为(65.59±76.95)和(83.78±76.38)ml、(2.78±1.18)和(3.43±1.66)d、(9.44±3.16)和(10.19±2.91)d、(20 954.31±1 745.10)和(20 635.65±1 376.92)元,组间比较差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。术后两组发生并发症分别为2例和3例,经保守治疗均痊愈。术后随访2个月~2年,单侧无功能肾患者生活正常,肿瘤患者无复发和转移。结论 3D比2D高清腹腔镜技术在肾脏切除术中的应用立体感更强,解剖层次更清晰,准确性更好,降低手术的一定难度,更适合应用于高难度手术。 【Objective】To compare the application effect of 3D and 2D HD laparoscopy in the kidney resection.【Methods】32 cases of kidney resection were completed with the Storz 3D HD laparoscopic(Group Observation).And the 37 finished cases were retrospectively analyzed and compared from January to December in 2013 with the help of Storz 2D HD laparoscopy(Group Comparison). They were compared their operation time, bleeding volume,complications, postoperative drainage, postoperative drainage tube removal time, the hospitalization time, postoperative hospitalization expenses, and statistical analysis. 【Results】Both groups of operation cases were successfully finished. The amount of bleeding and the operation time in two groups respectively(124.41 ± 52.90) min and(149.00 ± 33.68) min,(104.62 ± 57.69) ml and(136.89 ± 57.92) ml. It was a significant difference between the two groups(P〈0.05). Two groups of postoperative drainage, the drainage tube time, postoperative hospitalization time and total hospitalization expenses respectively were:(65.59 ± 76.95) ml and(83.78 ± 76.38) ml,(2.78 ± 1.18) d and(3.43 ± 1.66) d,(9.44 ± 3.16) d and(10.19 ± 2.91) d,(20954.31 ± 1745.10) yuan and(20635.65 ± 1376.92) yuan.There was no significant difference between groups(P〉0.05). For two groups there were 2 cases and 3 cases of complications, they were cured after conservative treatment. The postoperative follow-up ranged from 2 months to 2years, there were no living unilateral renal function patients, without any recurrence and metastasis cases appeared to the cancer patients. 【Conclusions】It is stronger 3D than 2D HD laparoscopic nephrectomy in the intraoperative three-dimensional. There is clear anatomical level, and better accuracy. It reduces the difficulty of operation. It is more suitable for high difficulty operation.
出处 《中国内镜杂志》 北大核心 2015年第12期1247-1251,共5页 China Journal of Endoscopy
基金 广西壮族自治区卫生厅自筹经费科研课题(No:Z2014529) 玉林市科学研究与技术计划项目(No:玉科计字201426003)
关键词 三维 二维 腹腔镜 无功能肾及肾恶性肿瘤 手术 three-dimensional two-dimensional laparoscopes no renal function and renal malignant tumor surgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1李汉忠,张玉石,张学斌,徐维锋,李永强,纪志刚,邓建华,黄厚锋,董德鑫.3D腹腔镜系统在泌尿外科手术中的应用[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2013,34(5):325-328. 被引量:103
  • 2张旭,李宏召,马鑫,等.泌尿外科腹腔手术学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:40-96.
  • 3张保,司马晋.3D腹腔镜的运用现状[J].临床外科杂志,2014,22(2):83-86. 被引量:8
  • 4徐维锋,李汉忠,张玉石,张学斌,严维刚,纪志刚,肖河,刘广华,文进.3D腹腔镜与2D腹腔镜下保留肾单位手术的对照研究[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2014,35(6):410-413. 被引量:22
  • 5RAMANI AP, DESAI MM, STEINBERG AP, ctal. Complications of laroscopic partial ncphrectomy in 200 cases[J]. J Urol, 2005, 173(1): 42-47.
  • 6LESLIE S, GOH AC, GILL IS. Partial nephrectomy: contemporary indications, techniques and outcomes[J]. Nat Rev Urol, 2013, I0 (5): 275-283.
  • 7CICIONE A, AUTORINO R, BREDA A, et al. Three-dimension- al vs standard laparoscopy: comparative assessment using a vali- dated progrom for laparoscopic urologic skills[J]. Urology, 2013, 82(6): 1444-1450.
  • 8GURUSAMY KS, SAHAY S, DAVIDSON BR. Three dimensional versus two dimensional imaging for laparoscopic cholecystectomy[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2011, 19(1): 1465-1468.
  • 9李化升,罗超,杨华,阮巧,王志梅.3D高清腹腔镜成像系统在泌尿外科手术中的初步应用[J].广西医学,2015,37(2):176-177. 被引量:7

二级参考文献71

  • 1梁朝朝,周骏.3D腹腔镜技术在泌尿外科的应用[J].微创泌尿外科杂志,2013,2(3):161-162. 被引量:25
  • 2张旭,傅斌.腹腔镜技术在泌尿外科中的应用进展[J].临床外科杂志,2007,15(1):29-32. 被引量:17
  • 3Nam KW, Park J, Kim IY, et al. Application of stereo-imaging technology to medical field. Healthc Inform Res, 2012, 18 : 158- 163.
  • 4Tanagho YS, Andriole GL, Paradis AG, et al. 2D versus 3D visualization: impact on laparoscopic proficiency using the funda- mentals of laparoscopic surgery skill set. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2012, 22: 865-870.
  • 5Sohn W, Lee HJ, Ahlering TE. Robotic surgery: review of pros- tate and bladder cancer. Cancer J, 2013, 19: 133-139.
  • 6von Pichler C, Radermacher K, Boeckmann W, et al. Three- dimensional versus two-dimensional video endoscopy: a clinical field study in laparoscopic application. Stud Health Technol Inform, 1996, 29: 667-674.
  • 7Becker H, Melzer A, Schurr MO, et al. 5-D video techniques in endoscopic surgery. Endosc Surg Allied Technol, 1993, 1 : 40- 46.
  • 8Calvano CJ, Moran ME, Tackett LD, et al. New visualization techniques for in utero surgery: amnioscopy with a three-dimen- sional head-mounted display and a computer-controlled endo- scope. J Endourol, 1998, 12: 407-410.
  • 9Honeck P, Wendt-Nordahl G, Rassweiler J, et al. Three-dimen- sional laparoscopic imaging improves surgical performance on standardized ex-vivo laparoscopic tasks. J Endourol, 2012, 26: 1085-1088.
  • 10Chan AC, Chang SC, Yim AP, et al. Comparison of two-dimen- sional vs three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic sur- gery. Surg Endosc, 1997, 11 : 438-440.

共引文献119

同被引文献23

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部