期刊文献+

关节镜辅助下治疗陈旧性下胫腓联合损伤的体会 被引量:3

Cilinical experience of arthroscopic treatment of chronic tibiofibular syndesmosis injury
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨在踝关节镜辅助下治疗陈旧性下胫腓联合损伤的疗效。方法回顾性分析2013年2月-2014年4月采用在踝关节镜辅助下探查和清理关节腔、复位和固定下胫腓关节、修复和重建损伤韧带的7例陈旧性下胫腓联合损伤患者的资料,其中男5例,女2例,平均37.5岁。术后根据临床及影像学资料和美国足踝外科协会踝关节功能(AOFAS)评分对临床结果进行评估。结果平均随访14.2个月;切口均一期愈合,没有出现切口感染及神经血管损伤;术后6个月根据AOFAS踝关节功能评分系统进行评分:优6例,良1例。结论通过关节镜辅助下治疗陈旧性下胫腓联合损伤可以得到有效的复位以及可靠的固定,具有创伤小、恢复快和并发症少等优点,短期疗效满意。 【Objective】To investigate the clinical result of ankle arthroscopy assisted in the treatment of chronic tibiofibular syndesmosis injury.【Methods】From February 2013 to April 2014, a retrospective analysis of the result of the patient who clean up the joint cavity, reduction and fixation of the tibiofibular syndesmosis, repair and reconstruction of ligament injury by the ankle arthroscopic. There are 7 cases, 5 cases were male, 2 female patients,with an average age of 37.5 years. The clinical results were evaluated according to the clinical and imaging data and AOFAS score. 【Results】Patients were followed up for an average of 14.2 months, there was no incision infection and injury of nerve and blood vessel.6 months postoperatively according to AOFAS ankle joint function scoring system score, 6 cases were excellent, good in 1 case. 【Conclusion】Arthroscopic treatment of chronic tibiofibular syndesmosis injury can get effective reduction and reliable fixation, and has the advantages of little injury, quick recovery and less complication and the short-term curative effect is excellent.
出处 《中国内镜杂志》 北大核心 2015年第12期1335-1339,共5页 China Journal of Endoscopy
关键词 踝关节 骨折固定术 关节不稳定性 ankle joint fracture fixation instability of joint
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1ZALAVRAS C, THORDARSON D. Ankle syndesmotic injury[J]. J Am Acad Orthop Snrg, 2007, 15(6): 330-339.
  • 2VAN DEN BEKEROM MP, DE LEEUW PA, VAN DIJK CN. Delayed operative treatment of syndesmotic instability. Current concepts review[J]. Injury, 2009, 40(11): 1137-1142.
  • 3PAKARINEN H. Stability-based classification for ankle fracture management and the syndesmosis injury in ankle rractures due to a supination external rotation mechanism of injury[J]. Acta Orthop Suppl, 2012, 83(347): 1-26.
  • 4JANKE M, WARZECHA C, BALLMER PM. Traumatic chronic instability of the proximal tibiofibular jolnt[J]. Unfallchirurg, 2008, 111(12): 1033-1036.
  • 5KITAOKA HB, ALEXANDER IJ, ADELAAR RS, et al. Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes[J]. Foot Ankle Int, 1994, 15(7): 349-353.
  • 6VAN-HEEST T. Comment on schepers: acute distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury: a systematic review of suture-button versus.syndesmotic screw repair[J]. Int Orthop, 2013, 37(1): 171.
  • 7TERAMOTO A, SUZUKI D, KAMIYA T, et al. Comparison of different fixation methods of the suture-button implant for tibiofibular syndesmosis injurles[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2011, 39 (10): 2226-2232.
  • 8WAGENER ML, BEUMER A, SWIERSTRA BA. Chronic insta- bility of the and results of anatomical reconstruction[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2011, 12: 212.
  • 9HERMANS JJ, GINAI AZ, WENTINK N, et al. The additional value of an oblique image plane for MRI of the anterior and posterior distal tibiofibular syndesmosis[J]. Skeletal Radiol, 2011, 40(1): 75-83.
  • 10RAJAGOPALAN S, UPADHYAY V, TAYLOR HP, et al. New intraoperative technique for testing the distal tibiofibular syn- desmosis[J]. Ann R Coil Surg Engl, 2010, 92(3): 258.

二级参考文献15

  • 1Michel PJ, Bas L, Mike H, et al. Which ankle fractures requires syn- desmotic stabilization? J Foot Ankle Surg,2007, 46: 456-463.
  • 2Boden SD, Labropoulos PA, McCowin P, et al. Mechanical considerations for the syndesmotic screw. A cadaver study. J Bone Joint Surg(Am), 1989, 71: 1548-1555.
  • 3Yamaguchi K, Martin CH, Boden SD, et al. Operative treatment of syndesmotic disruptions without use of a syndesmotic screw: a prospective clinical study. Foot Ankle lnt, 1994, 15: 407-414.
  • 4Chissell HR, Jones J. The influence of a diastasis screw on the outcome of Weber type-C ankle fractures. J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 1995, 77: 435-438.
  • 5Stark E, Tornetta P 3rd, Creevy WR. Syndesmotic instability in Weber B ankle fractures: A clinical evaluation. J Orthop Trauma, 2007,21: 643-646.
  • 6Heim D, Schmidlin V, Ziviello O. Do type B malleolar fractures need a positioning screw? Injury, 2002,33: 729-734.
  • 7Jenkinson RJ, Sanders DW, Macleod MD, et al. Intraoperative diagnosis of syndesmosis injuries in external rotation ankle fractures. J Orthop Trauma, 2005, 19: 604-609.
  • 8卢世璧,王继芳,王岩,等译.坎贝尔骨科手术学.10版.济南:山东科学技术出版社,2005:2622.
  • 9Bartonicek J. Anatomy of the tibiofibular syndesmosis and its clinical relevance. Surg Radiol Anat, 2003, 25: 379-386.
  • 10Xenos JS, Hopkinson WJ, Mulligan ME, et al. The tibiofibular syndesmosis. Evaluation of the ligamentous structures, methods of fixation, and radiographic assessment. J Bone Joint Surg(Am), 1995. 77: 847-856.

同被引文献42

引证文献3

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部