摘要
目的通过三种假丝酵母菌鉴定方法的比较,为临床选择假丝酵母菌的鉴定方法提供参考。方法用科玛嘉显色培养基、API 20C AUX生化系统和rRNA-ITS序列测定分析鉴定住院患者口腔培养出的198株假丝酵母菌,比较3种鉴定方法的结果。结果 API 20C AUX生化系统与rDNA-ITS序列测定分析鉴定结果一致,科玛嘉显色培养基与API 20C AUX生化系统和rDNA-ITS序列测定分析鉴定的符合率白假丝酵母菌为97.84%,热带假丝酵母菌的符合率为93.33%,光滑假丝酵母菌和克柔假丝酵母菌的符合率分别为90.91%、88.89%,其他假丝酵母菌科玛嘉不能鉴定。结论 API 20C AUX生化系统与rDNA-ITS序列测定分析鉴定假丝酵母菌的结果有较好的一致性,rDNA-ITS序列测定分析鉴定假丝酵母菌有望成为假丝酵母菌鉴定较好的方法。科玛嘉显色培养基方法可以简便有效的鉴定最常见的4种假丝酵母菌。
Objective To study the results of CHROMagar chromogenic medium, API 20C AUX biochemistry system and rDNA-ITS sequence analysis in identifying candida, and then compare their results. Methods Used CHROMagar ehromogenie medium, API 20C AUX biochemistry system and rDNA-ITS sequence analysis methods to identifieate 198 eandidia species which were isolated from oral cavity of in-patients, then compared the identification result of these three methods. Results The identified results of API 20C AUX biochemistry system and rDNA-ITS sequence analysis methods are same. Identification of Candida albicans by CHROMagar chromogenic medium is of 97.84% consistency of API 20C AUX biochemistry system and rDNA-ITS sequence analysis methods, whereas 93.33%, 90. 91% and 88.89% for Candida. tropicalis, Candida glabrata and Candida krusei respectively. CHROMagar chromogenic medium can not identify other eandida species. Conclusion API 20C AUX biochemistry system and rDNA-ITS sequence analysis methods can accurately identify all Candida spices. The CHROMAgar Candida medium is an easy and economic method for presumptive identification of the most commonly encountered Candida spp.
出处
《中国皮肤性病学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2016年第1期91-93,共3页
The Chinese Journal of Dermatovenereology
基金
云南省教育厅课题(09y0157)
国家自然科学基金项目(81160076)
云南省科技厅联合基金面上项目(2014FB030)