摘要
有关交通肇事罪的罪过形式,理论界认为交通肇事罪属于过失罪,而实务界则认为交通肇事罪对人的生命财产安全造成了伤害;有关交通肇事罪的"主体问题",理论界对从事交通运输人员成为交通肇事罪的主体没有争议,但是在交通肇事过程中交通运输以外的人员是否构成犯罪的主体则存在不少争议;有关交通肇事的"共犯问题",我国最高法院认为指示交通肇事者逃逸的人属于共犯,而理论界则认为所谓的"共犯"缺乏犯罪联系;有关交通肇事罪中"逃逸认定"的问题,从交通肇事逃逸时间以及致人死亡的情况来判定;有关交通肇事罪中量刑办法与理论间的矛盾问题,应该直接以交通肇事过程中造成的公私财产损失作为量刑的标准。
About the crime form of traffic accident, theorists think traffic accident crime belongs to negligence crime, however, practitioners think that traffic accident crime caused harm to people's life and property security; About "Main Problem" of traffic accident crime, theorists engaged in that the transportation as the main body of traffic offences without controversy, but in the process of traffic accident whether the transportation outside of the personnel constitutes the main body of crime exists controversy; About traffic accident "accomplice" , China's Supreme Court ruled that the people who indicates traffic perpetrator to escape belongs to the accomplice, but the theorists think that the socalled "accomplice" lack of criminal association; About the question on the "escape recognition" in the traffic accident, it is judged from the escape time of traffic perpetrators and deadly situatiom About the contradictions between the sentencing method and theory in traffic accident, the public and private property damage during the traffic accident should as the sentencing standards.
出处
《聊城大学学报(社会科学版)》
2016年第1期101-107,共7页
Journal of Liaocheng University:Social Science Edition
基金
福建省教育厅项目(2015006):全面推进依法治国背景下大学生法治教育课程改革研究
关键词
交通肇事罪
罪过形式
主体问题
逃逸认定
traffic accident crime
crime form
main problems
escape identification