期刊文献+

经皮冠状动脉介入术在冠状动脉左主干病变的应用效果

Outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with left main coronary artery lesions
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 总结经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)在冠状动脉左主干(LMCA)病变患者中的应用效果。方法 LMCA病变患者58例,按SYNTAX评分分为三组:低组(≤22分,15例)、中组(23~32分,30例)和高组(≥33分,13例)。均接受PCI治疗,随访PCI介入处理结果和主要不良心血管事件(MACE)发生情况。结果 患者均成功行PCI治疗:单支架组53例,双支架组5例。22例患者在PCI术后1年内行冠状动脉造影复查,2例(9.1%)发生支架内再狭窄。住院期间、PCI术后1个月时和1年时总体MACE发生率分别为1.7%、1.7%和7.0%。结论 对经选择的LMCA病变患者,多数可行单支架术式,PCI成功率高,MACE发生率较低。 Objective To summarize the outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) in the patients with left main coronary artery(LMCA) lesions. Methods On the basis of SYNTAX scores,58 patients with LMCA lesions were assigned into three groups of A(≤22 points, 15 cases), B(23-32 points, 30 cases) and C(≥33 points, 13 cases). The patients were followed up for 12 months. The efficacy and incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) of PCI were analyzed. Results PCI was successful in all cases, in whom single stent was implanted in 53 cases and double stents in five cases. Twenty-two cases were completed the follow up with angiography within one year after PCI, of whom 2 (9. 1%) cases had instent restenosis. The incidence rates of MACE during hospitalization, one month and one year after PCI were 1.7%, 1.7% and 7.0%, respectively. Conclusion On the basis of case selection, the majority of patients with LMCA lesions can be treated with single stent technique of PCI with high success rate and minor incidence rate of MACE
出处 《江苏医药》 CAS 2016年第1期35-37,共3页 Jiangsu Medical Journal
基金 苏州市科技发展计划指导项目(SYSD2010125)
关键词 冠状动脉左主干 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 Left main coronary artery Percutaneous coronary intervention
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass graftingfor severe coronary artery disease[J]. N Engl J Med, 2009, 360(10) : 961-972.
  • 2Kappetein AP, Feldman TE, Mack MJ, et al. Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with drug-eluting stenting for the treatment of left main and/or three-vessel disease: 3-year follow-up of the SYNTAX trial[J]. Eur Heart J, 2011,32 (17):2125-2134.
  • 3Mohr FW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, et al. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary interven- tion in patients with three-vessel disease and left main coronary disease: 5-year follow-up of the randomised, clinical SYNTAX trial[J]. Lancet, 2013,381(9867) : 629-638.
  • 4Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, et al. 2011 ACCF/ AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Interven- tion. A report of the American College of Cardiology Founda- tion/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2011,58(24) : e44- e122.
  • 5StephanWindecker, Kolh P, Alfonso F, et al. 2014 ESC/ EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization[J]. Rev Esp Cardiol(Engl Ed) ,2015,68(2) : 144.
  • 6.杨水祥,胡大一.心血管热点荟萃[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2011:57.
  • 7Kim WJ, Kim YH, Park DW, et al. Comparison of single- versus two-stent techniques in treatment of unprotected left main coronary bifurcation disease[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2011,77 (6) : 775-782.
  • 8Karrowni W, Makki N, Dhaliwal AS, et al. Single versus double stenting for unprotected left main coronary artery bifurcation lesions:a systematic review and meta-analysis[-J]. J Invasive Cardiol, 2014,26 (6) : 229-233.
  • 9Chen SL,Zhang Y,Xu B,et al. Five-year clinical follow-up of unprotected left main bifurcation lesion stenting: one-stent versus two-stent techniques versus double-kissing crush technique[J]. EuroIntervention, 2012,8 (7) : 803-814.
  • 10徐泽升,王炳勋,霍勇.冠状动脉介入治疗的双支架技术[J].中国介入心脏病学杂志,2011,19(3):156-158. 被引量:4

二级参考文献9

  • 1Latib A, Colombo A. Bifurcation disease : what do we know, what should we do? JACC Cardiovasc Interv,2008,1:218-226.
  • 2Colombo A, Stankovic G, Orlic D, et al. Modified T-stenting technique with crushing for bifurcation lesions:immediate results and 30-day outcome. Catheter Cardiovase Interv, 2003,60 : 145- 151.
  • 3Chen SL,Zhang JJ, Ye F, et al. Study comparing the double kissing (DK) crush with classical crush for the.treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions: the DKCRUSH-I Bifurcation Study with drug-eluting stents. Eur J Clin Invest,2008,38:361-371.
  • 4Ge L, lakovou I, Cosgrave J, et al. Treatment of bifurcation lesions with two stents: one year angiographic and clinical follow up of crush versus T stenting. Heart ,2006,92:371-376.
  • 5Chevalier B, Glatt B, Royer T, et al. Placement of coronary stents in bifurcation lesions by the " culotte" technique. Am J Cardiol, 1998,82:943-949.
  • 6Schampaert E, Fort S, Adelman AG, et al. The V-stent : a novel technique for coronary bifurcation stenting. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn, 1996,39:320-326.
  • 7Colombo A, Gaglione A, Nakamura S, et al. "Kissing" stents for bifurcational coronary lesion. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn, 1993,30: 327-330.
  • 8Medina A, Suarez de Lezo J, Pan M. [ A new classification of coronary bifurcation lesions]. Rev Esp Cardiol,2006,59:183.
  • 9Kaplan S, Barlis P, Dimopoulos K, et al. Culotte versus T-stenting in bifurcation lesions: immediate clinical and angiographic results and midterm clinical follow-up. Am Heart J ,2007,154:336-343.

共引文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部