期刊文献+

新疆风区下垫面动力学粗糙度估测值与模式定义值的对比 被引量:4

Aerodynamic roughness comparison between the estimated based on masts and the defined in model over Xinjiang wind areas
下载PDF
导出
摘要 按风向风速标准差法估算了新疆风能资源详查区17座测风塔一定范围内的动力学粗糙度,并与期间利用的3 km和1 km分辨率的数值模式中的动力学粗糙度理论定义值进行了对比。结果表明:除了采用的landuse基数据在一些区域的错误判识而导致本研究的估测值与中、小尺度模式中的动力学粗糙度理论定义值有较大差别外,大多数比较接近,今后有必要对这些区域的landuse的分类进行客观订正;夏季强风区的动力学粗糙度估测值普遍小于中尺度模式的理论定义值;对于主、次风向上动力学粗糙度值极不均匀区域,风向与风速标准差估算法需结合使用;本研究估算的动力学粗糙度是在中性层结条件下进行的,对于中性层结条件较少发生的区域,该动力学粗糙度估算值的普适性将受到限制。 Based on the data from 17 wind masts over Xinjiang wind areas,the aerodynamic roughness lengths extending some ranges are estimated using the standard deviations of wind speed and direction.Then the estimated roughness lengths in the target areas are compared with those defined in numerical model MM5 or WRF or CALMET on account of 3 km and 1 km horizontal resolutions,respectively. Results are as follows: In most of the cases,the defined roughness lengths are moderately consistent with the estimated ones while few of them show major discrepancies due to a misinterpretation of landuse dataset.Thus further emphasis should be on modifying these datasets. The calculated roughness lengths in the strong wind areas are uniformly smaller than the defined roughness in meso-scale model in summer. To attain a better accuracy in cases where the roughness in primary and secondary wind directions is severly nonhomogeneous,the two methods of wind speed and direction standard deviations should be combined. In this study,the roughness lengths are estimated with the samples in neutral atmosphere while they will not be the applicable in areas where neutral atmosphere barely occurs.
出处 《大气科学学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2015年第6期811-818,共8页 Transactions of Atmospheric Sciences
基金 中国气象局乌鲁木齐沙漠气象研究所开放课题(SQJ2011008) 天诺基业科创基金资助项目(2014TNJY011)
关键词 新疆风区 下垫面 估算的动力学粗糙度 MM5/WRF/CALMET动力学粗糙度值 Xinjiang wind areas underlying surface estimated dynamic roughness lengths theoretically defined dynamic roughness lengths in MM5 / WRF / CALMET models
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Beljaars A C M. 1987.The influence of sampling and filtering on measured wind gusts~ J] .J Atmos Ocean Technol,4:613-626.
  • 2Burian S, Stetson S W, Hart W S, et al.2004.High-resolution dataset of ur- ban canopy parameters for Houston, Texas [ C ~//Fifth Conference on Urban Environment. Vancouver : Canada.
  • 3陈家宜,王介民,光田宁.一种确定地表粗糙度的独立方法[J].大气科学,1993,17(1):21-26. 被引量:68
  • 4Davenport A G. 1960.Rationale for determining design wind velocities[ J]. Journal of the Structural Division, 86 (5) : 39-68.
  • 5Frey K E, Smith L C.2007. How well do we know northern land cover? Comparison of four global vegetation and wetland products with a newground-truth database for West Siberia[ J ].Global Biogeoehemical Cy- cles ,21 ( 1 ) : 1435-1440.
  • 6宫鹏.基于全球通量观测站的全球土地覆盖图精度检验[J].自然科学进展,2009,19(7):754-759. 被引量:19
  • 7Herold M, blayaux P, Woodcock C E, et al. 2008. Some challenges in global land cover mapping: An assessment of agreement and accuracy in existing 1 km datasets [ J ]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 112 (5) :2538-2556.
  • 8Houghton D D. 1985. Handbook of applied meteorology [ M ]. New York : Wiley.
  • 9胡文超,张文煜,张宇,郭振海,刘欣.河西走廊下垫面粗糙度实测值与模拟值的差异性分析[J].高原气象,2010,29(1):51-55. 被引量:12
  • 10刘和平,刘树华,朱廷曜,金昌杰,孔繁智,关德新.森林冠层空气动力学参数的确定[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),1997,33(4):522-528. 被引量:31

二级参考文献105

共引文献184

同被引文献67

引证文献4

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部