期刊文献+

“网络专车”的法经济学分析 被引量:6

“Online Ride- Hailing " Analyzed from the perspective of Jurisprudential Economics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 自嘀嘀、易到、优步等一众网络专车APP迅速占领移动互联网交通服务,以北上广为城市代表的交通管理部门一度打出"组合拳"对新兴事物进行严打,并引发了广泛的舆论争议。究其根源无疑在于网络专车平台打破了原有出租车行业的生态,直面撼动旧有垄断体制,直接分割既得利益集团的"奶酪"。借助法经济学的理论模型分析可知,当边际成本等于边际收益时达到帕累托最优,实现市场最高效,而"行政垄断"造成了出租车产业的低效和高额"份子钱";其次,对现行制度中"禁止私家车接入专车平台"的规定进行了法经济模型分析,对于需要进行市场先期占领的成长型软件而言,允许私家车接入专车平台则会实现企业规模效益,提高闲置资源的使用效率,充分发挥市场配置资源的决定作用,从而实现经济的真正共享。 Since such online ride -hailing apps as Didi, Kuaidi and San Francisco -based Uber quickly occupied online ride -hailing industry. Traffic management departments in Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou as representatives took a series of strict measures to launch the crackdown the newly sprouted, which sparked ex- tensive public controversy. Tracing it to its source, there is no doubt that the network broke former benefits pattern in the taxi industry, the old monopoly system of the original taxi industry, which got the interests " cheese" from the vested interest groups,had to face new challenges. According to the theoretical models of e- conomics, when the marginal cost equals marginal revenue, Pareto optimal will be got and the most efficient market will be achieved. However, "administrative monopoly" resulted in inefficiency and high share of ex- penses for a joint undertaking given to administrative agency. Secondly, the paper made the jurisprudential e- conomics model analysis of prohibiting the access of private car into online ride - hailing system. To those growing software for market pre - occupation, allowing private car into online ride - hailing system will achieve economies of scale of these enterprises, improving the efficient use of idle resources, and giving full play to the role of market in the decisive function of resource allocation, and thus achieve genuine sharing in economy.
出处 《知与行》 2015年第4期82-87,共6页 Cognition and Practice
关键词 网络专车 法经济学 行政垄断 市场配置资源 online ride -hailing Jurisprudential Economics administrative monopoly market allocation of resources
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1贺树龙.暴力冲突一再上演中国式专车将开往何方[EB/OL].(2015-06-16)[2015-09-29].http://tech.fire-fox.163.corn/15/0616/08/H3XLASBCAQPNVFUR_2.html.
  • 2滴滴:专车时代的“中国式智慧”[N].南京日报,2015-01-23.http://news.163.com/15/0123/06/AG-K156N300014AED.html.
  • 3国内打车软件用户1.5亿:快的份额达94%[EB/OL].(2014-11-04)[2015-09-30].http://teeh.sina.com.cn/i/2014-11-04/11109758834.shtml.
  • 4[美]理查德·波斯纳.法律的经济分析[M].北京.法律出版社,2012.240.
  • 5唐清利.“专车”类共享经济的规制路径[J].中国法学,2015(4):286-302. 被引量:364

二级参考文献31

  • 1邓晰隆,陈娟.“公共政策选择性执行”问题及其对策研究[J].甘肃行政学院学报,2006(4):55-57. 被引量:11
  • 2[古希腊]亚里士多德.《政治学》,吴寿彭译,商务印书馆1997年版,第178页.
  • 3See SARAH CANNON & LAWRENCE H. SUMMERS, HOW UBER AND THE SHARING ECONOMY CAN WIN OVER REGULATORS, at http ://blogs. hbr. org/2014/10/how uber andthe sharing economy can win over regulators ( Last visited on Oct. 13, 2014).
  • 4See RACHEL BOTSMAN, THE SHARING ECONOMY LACKS A SHARED DEFINITION, at http://www, fastcoexist, com/3022028/the sharing economy lacks ashared definition (Last visited on Nov. 21, 2013).
  • 5ANDREW LEONARD, "SHARING ECONOMY" SHAMS: DECEPTION AT THE CORE OF THE INTERNET' S HOTTEST BUSINESSES, at http://www, salon, com/2014/03/14/sharing economy shams deception at the core of the internets hottest businesses (Last visited on Mar. 14, 2014).
  • 6See Steven C. Hackett, Heterogeneities, Information, and Conflict Resolution: Experimental Evidence on Sharing Contracts, 6 J. THEORETICAL POL. 495, 495 - 97 (1994).
  • 7See Amy Kristin Sanders & Natalie Christine Olsen, Re-Defining Defamation : Psychological Sense of Community in the Age of the Internet, 17 COMM. L. & POL'Y,355 ,356 - 365 (2012).
  • 8See David Schleicher, The City as a Law and Economic Subject, 2010 U. ILL. L. REV. 1507~, 1558 (2010).
  • 9See MICHELLE REGNER, HOW THE WORLD' S BIGGEST BRANDS CAME TO LOVE THE SHARING ECONOMY, at http://www, virgin, corn/entrepreneur/how the worlds biggestbrands came to love the sharing economy (Last visited on June 30, 2014).
  • 10See APRIL RINNE, HOW SHAREABLE IS YOUR CITY?, at http ://www. collaborativeconsumption, com/2013/10/25/how shareable is your city( L~t visited on Oct. 25, 2013).

共引文献367

同被引文献39

  • 1滴滴:专车时代的“中国式智慧”[N].南京日报,2015-01-23.http://news.163.com/15/0123/06/AG-K156N300014AED.html.
  • 2杨红岩.专车要走远当有法治匡扶[N].中国交通报,2015-01-15.
  • 3卢鑫.专车司机与打车软件平台之间的法律关系探究[J].法制博览,2016(4):92-94.
  • 4贺树龙.暴力冲突-再上演中国式专车将开往何方[N].http://tech.fire-fox.163.com/15/0616/08/H3XLASBC4QPNVFUlL2.html.
  • 5曲振涛,杨凯钧.经济学教程[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2006:294.
  • 6崇晓萌,孙麒翔.专车之争有了交通部官方表态[N].北京商报,2015-1-9:第005版.
  • 7陈静.互联网约租车:“专车”还是“黑车”[N].经济日报,2015-1-6:第012版.
  • 8沈竹士.“专车”的互联网创新与监管[N].文汇报,2015-2-1:第008版.
  • 9张倩怡,曹晓晨.专车生意欲走出灰色地带[N].北京日报,2015-1-10:第007版.
  • 10刘远举.租车领域不应一味数量管制[N].21世纪经济报道,2015-1-12:第004版.

引证文献6

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部