期刊文献+

新考据学派与中国学术的现代转型

Study on the Contributions of the Neo-Philological School to the Promotion of Modern Chinese Academic Transformation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近代中国是一个转型时代,学术也进入转型期。民初,转型加速。新考据学派在这一转型期中的作用功不可没。他们呈现出不同于旧派的学术眼光和学术理念。在史料上,认为一切史料都是平等的,都有其价值,史料的范围大为扩充。由于史料的扩充,新领域大为开拓,敦煌学、甲骨学、考古学、民俗学等学问应运而生,新考据学派具开山之功。在学术观念上,他们主张"为学术而学术",治学贵在求是,不主致用。 Modern China is an era of transformation, and it also saw the transformation of Chinese academic studies. In the early years of the Republic of China, this transition was accelerated. New school of textual research made indelible contribution to the transition, and they showed different view and philosophy on academic study in comparison with old schools. On historical literature everything is equal and has its value; moreover, the range of it should be enlarged. Since the expansion of historical literature, new research fields(such as studies on Dun Huang, Jiagu, archaeology, folklore, etc.) have been exploited with the power of new school of textual research. As regard to academic view, they advocate the idea of 'for the academic study', and pursue truth not application practice.
作者 董恩强
出处 《湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第1期88-95,161,共8页 Journal of Hubei University(Philosophy and Social Science)
基金 国家社会科学基金资助项目:12BZS055
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1王国维.观堂集林:下[M].石家庄:河北教育出版社,2001.
  • 2顾颉刚.一九二六年始刊词[J].北京大学研究所国学门周刊,1926,2(13).
  • 3傅斯年.傅斯年全集:第二卷[M].长沙:湖南教育出版社,2003.
  • 4傅斯年. 历史语言研究所工作之旨趣[J]. 历史语言研究所集刊, 1928, (1): 3-10.
  • 5蒋天枢.陈寅恪先生编年事辑(增订本)[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1997.93-94.
  • 6杨树达.积微翁回忆录[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1986.
  • 7傅斯年.傅斯年全集第三卷[M].长沙:湖南教育出版社,2003.
  • 8陈垣.敦煌劫余录序[M]//陈垣史学论著选.陈乐素,陈智超,编校.上海:上海人民出版社,1981.
  • 9傅斯年.傅斯年全集:第六卷[M].长沙:湖南教育出版社,2003.
  • 10魏建功.《歌谣》四十年[J].民间文学,1962(1,2).

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部