摘要
目的:比较洛铂/顺铂联合依托泊苷治疗初治小细胞肺癌的疗效和安全性。方法:60例初治小细胞肺癌患者随机均分为观察组和对照组。观察组患者给予注射用洛铂30 mg/m^2,加入5%葡萄糖注射液500 ml中,d1,静脉滴注1 h+依托泊苷注射液100mg/m^2,加入0.9%氯化钠注射液500 ml中,d_(1~3),静脉滴注1 h。对照组患者给予注射用顺铂25 mg/m^2,加入0.9%氯化钠注射液500ml中,d_(1~3),静脉滴注1 h+依托泊苷注射液(用法用量同观察组)。两组患者均以3周为1个化疗周期。观察两组患者的临床疗效及毒性反应。结果:两组患者均完成2个周期以上的治疗。两组患者总有效率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组患者恶心呕吐、腹泻Ⅰ~Ⅳ度总发生率均显著低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:洛铂/顺铂联合依托泊苷治疗初治小细胞肺癌的疗效相当,但在安全性方面洛铂优于顺铂。
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of lobaplatin / cisplatin combined with etoposide in the treatment of primary small cell lung cancer. METHODS: 60 patients with small cell lung cancer were randomly divided into observation group and control group. Observation group was given 30 mg/m^2 Lobaplatin injection, adding into 500 ml 5% Glucose injection, d1, by intravenous infusion for 1 h+100 mg/m2 Etoposide injection, adding into 500 ml 0.9% Sodium chloride injection, d1-3, by intravenous infusion for 1 h. Control group was given 25 mg/m^2 Cisplatin injection, adding into 500 ml 0.9% Sodium chloride injection, d1-3,by intravenous infusion for 1 h+Etoposide injection(the same dose with observation group). 3-week was regarded as a chemotherapy cycle. The clinical efficacy and toxicities in 2 groups were observed. RESULTS: There were more than 2 cycles for both groups. There was no significant difference in the total effective rate between 2 groups(P〉0.05), and the incidences of nausea, vomiting and diarrhea in observation group were significantly lower than control group, the differences were statistically significant (P〈 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Lobaplatin/cisplatin combined with etoposide has similar efficacy in the treatment of primary small cell lung cancer, and lobaplatin has better safety.
出处
《中国药房》
CAS
北大核心
2016年第3期306-308,共3页
China Pharmacy
关键词
初治
小细胞肺癌
洛铂
顺铂
肺癌
Primary
Small cell lung cancer
Lobaplatin
Cisplatin
Lung cancer