期刊文献+

基于微博评论的虚假消息检测模型 被引量:9

A Rumor Detection Model Based on Weibo' Reviews
下载PDF
导出
摘要 微博虚假消息的判别是微博研究中的难点问题。为了实现快速准确识别,从源微博的评论角度出发定义了三个不同特征:支持性、置信度、内容相关性。利用所选三个特征作为输入,构建SVM分类算法判别消息真伪。以抓取的新浪微博上的真实数据集作为实验对象,利用提出的模型进行了实验并与人工神经网络对比,在虚假微博的识别中初步取得了较好的结果,可以有效的识别虚假消息。 Identification of the rumor information has become a challenge topice in the field of "Weibo" research. This paper defined three features of Weibo users' reviews which include support value, confidence and correlation in order to identify water army quickly and exactly. This research used these three features as the input of SVM classification algorithm to identify the truthfulness of one tweet. The experiment dataset included real user data which was abstracted from Sina Weibo. After experiments using model this paper refers to, and comparing our method with Neu- ral Network, better results are preliminarily got in the recognition of fake Weibo contents, which is very effective.
机构地区 北京工商大学
出处 《计算机仿真》 CSCD 北大核心 2016年第1期386-390,412,共6页 Computer Simulation
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(13YJC860006)
关键词 微博 评论 谣言 支持向量机 Weibo Review Rumor SVM
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1C Castillo, M Mendoza, B Poblete. Information credibility on twit- ter[ C ]. Proceedings of the 20th international conference on World wide web. ACM, 2011:675-684.
  • 2V Qazvinian, et al. Rumor has it: Identifying misinformation in microblogs[ C ]. Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Meth- ods in Natural Language Processing. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2011 : 1589-1599.
  • 3Y Suzuki. A credibility assessment for message streams on microb- logs [ C ]. P2P, Parallel, Grid, Cloud and Internet Computing (3PGCIC), 2010 International Conference on . IEEE, 2010:527- 530.
  • 4K R Canini, B Suh, P L Pirolli. Finding credible information sources in social networks based on content and social structure [C]. Privacy, security, risk and trust (passat), 2011 ieee third international conference on and 2011 ieee third international con- ference on social computing (socialcom). IEEE, 2011:1-8.
  • 5M Mendoza, B Poblete, C Castillo. Twitter under crisis: Can we trust what we RT? [ C ]. Proceedings of the first workshop on so- cial media analytics. ACM, 2010:71-79.
  • 6T Takahashi, N Igata. Rumor detection on twitter[ C]. Soft Com- puting and Intelligent Systems (SCIS) and 13th International Sym- posium on Advanced Intelligent Systems (ISIS), 2012 Joint 6th International Conference on. IEEE, 2012:452-457.
  • 7H S A1-Khalifa, R M A1-Eidan. An experimental system for measuring the credibility of news content in twitter [J]. Interna- tional Journal of Web Information Systems, 2011,7 (2) : 130- 151.
  • 8S Aladhadh, X Zhang, M Sanderson. Tweet Author Location Im- pacts on Tweet Credibility[ C]. Proceedings of the 2014 Australa- sian Document Computing Symposium. ACM, 2014:73.
  • 9C Castillo, M Mendoza, B Poblete. Predicting information credi- bility in time-sensitive social media[J].Internet Research, 2013, 23 (5) :560-588.
  • 10Q Qiu, et al. Credibility Estimation of Stock Comments Based on Publisher and Information Uncertainty Evaluation [ C ]. Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 2014 : 400-408.

二级参考文献135

  • 1任一奇,王雅蕾,王国华,冯伟.微博谣言的演化机理研究[J].情报杂志,2012,31(5):50-54. 被引量:40
  • 2李景涛,荆一楠,肖晓春,王雪平,张根度.基于相似度加权推荐的P2P环境下的信任模型[J].软件学报,2007,18(1):157-167. 被引量:115
  • 3Sudbury J.The Proportion of the Population Never Hearing a Rumour[J].Appl.Prob.,1985,22(11):443-446.
  • 4Zhou Re,Liu Zonghua,Li Baowen.Influence of Network Structure on Rumor Propagation[J].Physics Letters A,2007,368(11):458-463.
  • 5Zhao Hui,Gao Ziyou.Modular Effects on Epidemic Dynamics in Small-world Networks[J].Europhysics Letters,2007,79(3):380-382.
  • 6Ferrer R,Sole R V.Optimization in Complex Networks[J].Lect.Notes Phys,2003,25(6):114-125.
  • 7Weng J, Lim E, Jiang J, et al. TwitterRank: finding topicsensitive influential twitterers[C]//Proceedings of the 3rd ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM '10). New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2010: 261-270.
  • 8Cha M, Haddadi H, Benevenuto F, et al. Measuring user influence in Twitter: the million follower fallacy[C]//Proceedings of the 4th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM 2010), 2010: 10-17.
  • 9Qazvinian v, Rosengren E, Radev D, et al. Rumor has it:identifying misinformation in microblogs[C]//Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP ' 11). Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2011: 1589-1599.
  • 10Grove F, Sen S. TwitAg: a multi-agent feature selection and recommendation framework for Twitter[C]//LNCS 7057: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems (PRIMA '10). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2012: 394-397.

共引文献207

同被引文献63

引证文献9

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部