期刊文献+

基于位置的非对称相似性度量的协同过滤推荐算法 被引量:10

Location-based asymmetric similarity for collaborative filtering recommendation algorithm
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为提升推荐系统的准确率,针对传统协同过滤(CF)推荐算法没有有效使用位置信息的问题,提出了一种基于位置的非对称相似性度量的协同过滤推荐算法(LBASCF)。首先,分别利用用户-商品评分矩阵和用户历史消费位置,计算出用户间的余弦相似性和基于位置的非对称相似性;其次,将余弦相似性与基于位置的相似性融合,得到一个新的非对称用户相似性,融合后的相似性能够同时反映用户在位置上和兴趣上的偏好;最后,根据用户的最近邻居对商品的评分向用户推荐新的商品。用某点评数据集和Foursquare数据集对算法的有效性进行了评估。在某点评数据集实验结果证明,与CF相比,LBASCF的召回率和精确率分别提高了1.64%和0.37%;与位置感知协同过滤推荐系统(LARS)方法比较,LBASCF的召回率和精确率分别提高了1.53%和0.35%。实验结果表明,LBASCF相对于CF和LARS在基于位置服务的应用中能够有效提高系统的推荐质量。 To improve the accuracy of the recommendation system, a Location-Based Asymmetric Similarity for Collaborative Filtering( LBASCF) recommendation algorithm was proposed for the problem that traditional Collaborative Filtering( CF) recommendation algorithm does not consider the location information. Firstly, the cosine similarity and the Location-Based Asymmetric Similarity( LBAS) between users were calculated by the user-item rating matrix and the user's historical consumption location; secondly, a new user similarity measure was obtained by fusing the cosine similarity and location-based similarity. The blended similarity could reflect the user's preferences in both location and interest. Finally,based on the ratings of the user's nearest neighbors, new items were recommended to the user. The effectiveness of the algorithm was evaluated by using a dianping dataset and Foursquare dataset. The experimental results on the dianping dataset show that, compared with CF, the recall and precision of LBASCF were increased by 1. 64% and 0. 37% respectively;compared with the Location-Aware Recommender System( LARS), the recall and precision of LBASCF were increased by1. 53% and 0. 35% respectively. The experimental results show that LBASCF can achieve better recommendation quality of the system based on the application of location-based services than CF and LARS.
出处 《计算机应用》 CSCD 北大核心 2016年第1期171-174,180,共5页 journal of Computer Applications
基金 江苏省六大人才高峰项目~~
关键词 协同过滤 基于位置服务 个性化推荐 位置感知 基于位置的用户相似性 Collaborative Filtering(CF) location-based service personalized recommendation location-aware location-based user similarity
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1LIU B, XIONG H, PAPADIMITRIOU S, et al. A general geographical probabilistic factor model for point of interest recommendation [J]. IEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering, 2015, 27(5): 1167-1179.
  • 2WAN C, KAO B, CHEUNG D W, et al. Location-sensitive re-sources recommendation in social tagging systems [C]// Proceedings of the 21th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. New York: ACM, 2012: 1960-1964.
  • 3CHO E, MYERS S A, LESKOVEC J. Friendship and mobility: user movement in location-based social networks [C]// KDD'11: Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. New York: ACM, 2011: 1082-1090.
  • 4BAO J, ZHENG Y, MOKBEL M F. Location-based and preference-aware recommendation using sparse geo-social networking data [C]// Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems. New York: ACM, 2012: 199-208.
  • 5CACHEDA F, CARMEIRO V, FEMANDEZ D, et al. Comparison of collaborative filtering algorithms: limitations of current techniques and proposals for scalable, high-performance recommender systems [J]. ACM transactions on the Web, 2011, 5(1): Article No. 2.
  • 6YE M, YIN P, LEE W, et al. Exploiting geographical influence for collaborative point-of-interest recommendation [C]// SIGIR'11: Proceedings of the 34th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. New York: ACM, 2011: 325-334.
  • 7BERJANI B, STRUFE T. A recommendation system for spots in location-based online social networks [C]// SNS'11: Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Social Network Systems. New York: ACM, 2011: Article No. 4.
  • 8YE M, YIN P, LEE W. Location recommendation for location-based social networks [C]// GIS'10: Proceedings of the 18th SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems. New York: ACM, 2010: 458-461.
  • 9PARK M, HONG J, CHO S. Location-based recommendation system using Bayesian user's preference model in mobile devices [C]// UIC 2007: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Ubiquitous Intelligence and Computing. Berlin: Springer, 2007: 1130-1139.
  • 10YUAN Q, CONG G, MA Z, et al. Time-aware point-if-interest recommendation [C]// SIGIR'13: Proceedings of the 36th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. New York: ACM, 2013: 363-372.

二级参考文献13

  • 1Brccsc J, Hcchcrman D, Kadic C. Empirical analysis of predictive algorithms for collaborative filtering. In: Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI'98). 1998.43~52.
  • 2Goldberg D, Nichols D, Oki BM, Terry D. Using collaborative filtering to weave an information tapestry. Communications of the ACM, 1992,35(12):61~70.
  • 3Resnick P, lacovou N, Suchak M, Bergstrom P, Riedl J. Grouplens: An open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews. In:Proceedings of the ACM CSCW'94 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. 1994. 175~186.
  • 4Shardanand U, Mats P. Social information filtering: Algorithms for automating "Word of Mouth". In: Proceedings of the ACM CHI'95 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1995. 210~217.
  • 5Hill W, Stead L, Rosenstein M, Furnas G. Recommending and evaluating choices in a virtual community of use. In: Proceedings of the CHI'95. 1995. 194~201.
  • 6Sarwar B, Karypis G, Konstan J, Riedl J. Item-Based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 10th International World Wide Web Conference. 2001. 285~295.
  • 7Chickering D, Hecherman D. Efficient approximations for the marginal likelihood of Bayesian networks with hidden variables.Machine Learning, 1997,29(2/3): 181~212.
  • 8Dempster A, Laird N, Rubin D. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 1977,B39:1~38.
  • 9Thiesson B, Meek C, Chickering D, Heckerman D. Learning mixture of DAG models. Technical Report, MSR-TR-97-30, Redmond:Microsoft Research, 1997.
  • 10Sarwar B, Karypis G, Konstan J, Riedl J. Analysis of recommendation algorithms for E-commerce. In: ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce. 2000. 158~167.

共引文献554

同被引文献46

引证文献10

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部