期刊文献+

“追逐”动词语义图 被引量:14

A Semantic Map for "CHASE"
原文传递
导出
摘要 语言中的"追逐"义动词常常具有多义性,这种多义模式在不同的语言中既有共性也有差异。语言类型学领域近二十年来兴起的语义图模型最初用来表征语法形式的多功能性,可以借鉴它来表征实词的多义性,使之成为词汇类型学研究的一个有价值的框架和工具。 Semantic Map Model has become a powerful methodological tool for typological studies in recent years, which has been used to represent various polysemies of grammatical elements. Based on a corpus of 50 lexical headwords in 29 languages or dialects, this paper uses Semantic Map Model to analyze the complex semantic network associated with the notion "chase". A universal conceptual space, including 27 nodes associated with 27 different uses of chasing verbs in these languages, is built in this paper. The different uses of each chasing verb can be related by their adjacency on the map. In other words, each verb covers a contiguous area. For example, in Mandarin Chinese there are two main chasing verbs, i.e. zhu~ "~_.~" andg^in"~", which have various but related uses exhibited by their adjacency on the map, as illustrated below: In order to make an overall explanation for the map, four semantic elements, i.e. ORDER, FORCE, CATCHING and DEPARTING, can be extracted for the illustration of semantic extension among different uses. This map can also make predictions about diachronic change by showing that some changes presuppose others. For example, if a hunting verb ( such as the Archaic Chinese lexical item zhu “逐”) is extended to additional uses and comes to express "drive out", it must have been extended to the meaning of "chase" before. The case study on chasing verb shows that Semantic Map Model is compatible with the lexicon and can be a helpful tool for lexical typology.
作者 张定
出处 《当代语言学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第1期51-71,共21页 Contemporary Linguistics
关键词 语义图 词汇类型学 “追逐”动词 多义性 Semantic Map, lexical typology, chasing verb, polysemy
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Croft, W. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
  • 2Croft, W.2003. Typology and Universals. 2nd edition. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
  • 3Croft, W. and D. A. Cruse. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
  • 4Fang,Y.(方一新).2010.《中古近代汉语词汇学》.北京:商务印书馆.
  • 5Francois, A. 2008. Semantic maps and the typology of colexidication: Interwining polysemous networks across languages. In M. Vanhove, ed., From Polysemy to Semantic Change. Amsterdam./ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Pp. 163-215.
  • 6Haspelmath, M. 1997. From Space to Time : Temporal Adverbials in the World's Languages. Mtinchen: Lincom.
  • 7Haspelmath, M. 2003. The geometry of grammatical meaning: Semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison. In M. Tomasello, ed., The New Psychology of Language, Vol. 2. New York, NY: Erlbaum. Pp. 211-43.
  • 8Hickey, R. 2003. Language change. In J. Verschueren, J.-O. 0stman and J. Blommaert, eds., Handbook of Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Pp. 1-35.
  • 9蒋绍愚.怎样掌握古汉语的词义——兼谈“义位”和“义素”在词义分析中的运用[J].语文研究,1981(2):80-86. 被引量:2
  • 10Jongen, R. 1985. Polysemy, tropes and cognition or the non-Magrittian art of closing curtains whilst opening them. In W. Paprott6 and R. Dirven, eds., The Ubiquity of Metaphor. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Pp. 121-39.

二级参考文献43

  • 1余嘉锡.《四库提要辨证》.第862页.科学出版社,1985年版.
  • 2Anderson, L.B. 1982. The 'perfect' as a universal and as a language-particular category. In Paul J. H., ed. , Tense-aspect : Between Semantics and Pragmatics. Amsterdam : Benjamins. Pp. 227 - 64.
  • 3Anderson, L.B. 1986. Evidentials, paths of change, and mental maps: Typologically regular asymmetries. In W. Chafe and J. Nichols, ed. , Evidentiality: The Linguistic Encoding of Epistemology. Norwood, N. J. : Ablex. Pp. 273 -312.
  • 4Bybee, J. , R. Perkins and W. Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  • 5Clancy, S.J. 2006. The topology of Slavic case: Semantic maps and multidimensional scaling. Glossos 7. http ://www. seelrc, org/glossos/issues/7/clancy, pdf [ accessed 29, Sep. 2011 ].
  • 6Croft, W. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • 7Croft, W.2003. Typology and Universals. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 8Croft, W. 2007. Typology and linguistic theory in the past decade: A personal view. Linguistic Typology 11,79 -91.
  • 9Croft, W. and K.T. Poole. 2008a. Inferring universals from grammatical variation: Multidimensional scaling for typological analysis. Theoretical Linguistics 34,1 : 1 - 37.
  • 10Croft, W. and K.T. Poole. 2008b. Multidimensional scaling and other techniques for uncovering universals. Theoretical Linguistics 34,1:75 - 84.

共引文献40

同被引文献171

引证文献14

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部