期刊文献+

EGFR-TKIs维持治疗晚期肺腺癌的临床效果 被引量:5

Clinical Efficacy of EGFR-TKIs Maintenance Treatment for Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨EGFR-TKIs维持治疗晚期肺腺癌的疗效。方法选取肺腺癌58例,按治疗方法不同,一线化疗后EGFR-TKIs维持治疗组32例,一线化疗后观察或最佳支持治疗组26例。维持治疗组距末次化疗21 d后,开始口服吉非替尼或厄洛替尼,每8周复查病灶,持续至疾病进展死亡或因不能耐受的不良反应而终止治疗。结果 32例维持治疗组患者中,CR 0例,PR 9例,SD 15例,PD 8例,客观缓解率ORR(CR+PR)为28.1%,疾病控制率DCR(CR+PR+SD)为75.0%。26例观察对照组患者中,CR 0例,PR 2例,SD 9例,PD 15例,客观缓解率ORR(CR+PR)7.7%,疾病控制率DCR(CR+PR+SD)42.3%。维持治疗组与观察组比较,近期疗效ORR、DCR均有统计学差异(P<0.05)。女性疗效高于男性。基因突变阳性有效率55.0%,未知组有效率16.7%,基因敏感突变组疗效显著高于未知组。结论EGFR-TKIs维持治疗晚期肺腺癌的疗效较好,值得临床推广。 Objective To investigate the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs in the treatment of advanced lung adenocarcinoma.Methods 58 patients with lung adenocarcinoma were divided into maintenance treatment group( 32 cases),and observation or best supportive treatment group( 26 cases) after first-line chemotherapy. The maintenance treatment group was given oral gefitinib or erlotinib 21 d after the last chemotherapy,and received detection every 8 weeks until died of disease progression or had intolerable adverse reactions. Results Of the 32 patients in maintenance treatment group,CR was 0,PR 9,SD 15,PD 8,objective remission rate ORR( CR + PR) was 28. 1%,and disease control rate DCR( CR + PR + SD) was 75. 0%. In the control group,26 cases were observed,CR 0 cases,PR 2 cases,SD 9 cases,PD 15 cases,objective remission rate ORR( CR + PR) was 7. 7%,the disease control rate DCR( CR + PR + SD) was 42. 3%. Maintenance treatment group compared with the observation group,shortterm efficacy of ORR and DCR had statistical difference( P〈0. 05). The efficacy of female was higher than that of male. The positive rate of gene mutation was 55%,the efficiency of the unknown group was 16. 7%. Conclusion EGFR-TKIs maintenance treatment is effective for advanced lung adenocarcinoma,and it is worthy of clinical promotion.
出处 《实用癌症杂志》 2016年第1期63-66,共4页 The Practical Journal of Cancer
基金 莆田市科技计划项目[编号:2009S09(2-3)]
关键词 EGFR-TKIS 晚期肺腺癌 缓解率 有效率 EGFR-TKIs Advanced lung adenocarcinoma Remission rate Efficiency
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1宋俞,方罗,戚雅君.埃克替尼与吉非替尼治疗既往化疗失败的局部晚期或转移性非小细胞肺癌患者的系统性评价[J].中国医院用药评价与分析,2014,14(7):602-605. 被引量:4
  • 2Lee SM, Khan I, Upadhyay S, et al. First-line erlotinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer unsuita- ble for chemotherapy (TOPICAL) : a double-blind, place- bo-controlled, phase 3 trial [ J 1. Lancet Oncol, 2012, 13 (11) :1161-1170.
  • 3崔瀚之,管静芝,廖国清,刘鹏辉,李亮亮,邵艳.埃克替尼与吉非替尼治疗表皮生长因子受体突变的晚期肺腺癌疗效观察[J].解放军医学院学报,2015,36(4):326-328. 被引量:14
  • 4Ettinger DS, Akerley W, Bepler G, et al. Non-small cell lung cancer [ J ~. J Natl Compr Canc Netw,2010,8 ( 7 ) :740-801.
  • 5毋永娟,崔荣,华云旗,杨燕霞,刘丽萍,谭亚琴,张文慧,袁海清,刘伟东.培美曲塞与厄洛替尼维持治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床研究[J].中国全科医学,2011,14(9):966-968. 被引量:18
  • 6Cappuzzo F, Ciuleanu T, Stelmakh L, et al. Erlotinib as ma- inte~aance treatment in advanced non-small-cell lung canc- er: a muhicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 study ~ J 1. Lancet Onco1,2010,11 (6) :521-529.
  • 7周彩存,陈晓霞.非小细胞肺癌维持治疗的争议与共识[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2012,35(2):91-93. 被引量:9
  • 8Zhou C, Wu YL, Chen G, et al. Erlotinib versus chemothera- py as first-line treatment for patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (OPTIMAL, CTONG-0802 ): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 study[ J~. Lancet Oncol,2011,12 (8) :735-742.
  • 9Gatzemeier U, Pluzanska A, Szczesna A, et al. Phase llI st- udy of erlotinib in combination with cisplatin and gemcit- abine non-small-cell lung cancer:the Tarceva Lung Cancer Investigation Trial [ J ~. J Clin Oncol, 2007,25 ( 12 ) : 1545- 1552.
  • 10Herbst RS,Prager D, Hermann R, et al. TRIBUTE : a phase 111 trial of erlotinib hydrochloride (OSL-774) combined with carboplatin and paelitaxel chemotherapy in advanced non-small lung cancer [ J ]. J Clin Oncol, 2005,23 ( 25 ) : 5892-5899.

二级参考文献94

  • 1Stinchcombe TE, Socinki MA. Treatment paradigms for advanced stage non - small cell lung cancer in the era of multiple lines of therapy [J]. J Thoracic Oncol, 2009, 4 : 243 - 250.
  • 2Brodowicz T, Krzakowski M, Zwitter M, et al. Central European Co- operative Oncology Group (CECOG) : Cisplatin and gemcitabine first -line chemotherapy followed by maintenance gemcitabine or best support- ive care in advanced non - small cell lung cancer: a phase Ⅲ trial [ J ].Lung Cancer 2006, 52:155 - 163.
  • 3Fidias PM, Dakhil SR, Lyss AP, et al. Phase Ⅲ study of immediatecompared with delayed docetaxel after front - line therapy with gemcit- abine plus carboplatin in advanced non - small - cell lung cancer [ J]. J Clin Oncol, 2009, 27:591-598.
  • 4Bogaert DP, Pouw EM, van Wijhe G, et al. Pemetrexed maintenance therapy in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma [ J ]. J ThoracOncol, 2006, 1 : 25 -30.
  • 5Ciuleanu TE, Brodowicz T, Belani CP, et al. Maintenance peme- trexed plus best supportive care (BSC) versus placebo plus BSC : a phase Ⅲ study [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2008, 26 (Suppl): 8011.
  • 6Belani CP, Brodowicz T, Ciuleanu T, et al. Maintenance pemetrexed (Pem) plus best supportive care (BSC) versus placebo (Plac) plusBSC: a randomized phase Ⅲ study in advanced non - small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2009, 27 (Suppl): CRA8000.
  • 7Zielinski CC, Yang S, Santoro A, et al. Tolerability of pemetrexedversus placebo as a maintenance therapy in advanced non - small cell lung cancer: evidence from a large randomized study [ J ]. J Clin On- col, 2008, 26: 8060.
  • 8Lee JS, Ignacio C. FAST - ACT: a phase II randomized double - blindtrail of sequential erlotinib and chemotherapy as first - line treatment inpatients with stage Ⅲ/IV non - small cell lung cancer [ J]. Proc AmSoe Clin Oneol, 2008, 11 (4) : 201 -202.
  • 9Goldie JH,Coldman A J,Gudauskas GA.Rationale for the use of alternating non-cross-resistant chemotherapy. Cancer Treat Rep,1982,66:439-449.
  • 10Day RS. Treatment sequencing, asymmetry, and uncertainty:protocol strategies for combination chemotherapy. Cancer Res,1986,46:3876-3885.

共引文献59

同被引文献38

引证文献5

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部