期刊文献+

基于脑电格子复杂性分析的麻醉深度监测研究 被引量:2

Monitoring Anesthetic Depth Based on Lattice Complexity of Electroencephalogram
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于符号序列的细粒化方法和两种分划方法(均值分划与排列分划),将格子复杂性(Lattice complexity,LC)用于麻醉时期脑电信号复杂度分析。选取了30例丙泊酚全麻患者,分别计算了LC和lempel-ziv(LZ)复杂性,并比较了两者与BIS的Pearson相关性。结果表明诱导期均值分划LC效果较好,恢复期排列分划LC效果较好,与BIS的Pearson相关性为0.963 6。对于整个麻醉期均值分划LC效果最佳,与BIS相关性为0.841 6,同时细粒化指数一般取3可得到不错的效果,可为临床麻醉深度监测提供一个新方法。 Based on fine-graining method and two partition methods(permutation partition and average partition),lattice complexity(LC)was used in EEG complexity analysis under anesthesia in this paper.By using the EEG of 40 patients who underwent general anesthesia with propofol,we calculated the Lattice complexity and lempel-ziv(LZ)complexity and compared Pearson's correlation coefficient between LC,LZ and BIS values. Results showed that duringanesthesia induction period,average partition with lattice complexity get better effect. While during anesthesiarecovery period,permutation partition with lattice complexity get better result,and the Pearson's correlation coeffi-cient between LC and BIS values was 0.963 6. During the whole anesthesia period,Average partition with lattice com-plexity get better effect,and the the Pearson's correlation coefficient between LC and BIS values was 0.841 6. Thefine-graining order take 3 can get good result. All these provide a new method for clinical anesthetic depth monitoring.
出处 《传感技术学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第12期1747-1753,共7页 Chinese Journal of Sensors and Actuators
基金 浙江省自然科学基金项目(LY13H180004) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目
关键词 麻醉深度 格子复杂性 排列分划 lempel-ziv复杂性 depth of anesthesia lattice complexity permutation partition lempel-ziv complexity
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1张晓青,戴茹萍,成芳丽.麻醉深度监测技术研究进展[J].大家健康(学术版),2014(8):313-313. 被引量:2
  • 2Franks N P. General Anaesthesia:From Molecular Targets to Neu- ronal Pathways of Sleep and Arousal[J]. Nat Rev Neurosci, 2008, 9(5) : 370-386.
  • 3Jameson L C, Sloan T B. Using EEG to Monitor Anesthesia Drug Effects During Surgery [J]. J Clin Monit Comput, 2006, 20 (6) : 445-472.
  • 4Groeott H P, Davie S, Fedorow C. Monitoring of Brain Function in Anesthesia and Intensive Care [ J ]. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol, 2010, 23(6) :759-764.
  • 5Rampil I J. A Primer for EEG Signal Processing in Anesthesia[J]. Anesthesiology, 1998,89(4) : 980-1002.
  • 6Butch N R. Period Analysis of EEG on a Grneral-Purpose Digtal Computer[J]. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1964,155:827-43.
  • 7Drummond J C, Brann C A, Perkins D E. A Comparison of Median Frequency, Spectral Edge Frequency, a Frequency Band Power Ratio, Total Power, and Dominance Shift in the Determination of Depth of Anaesthesia [J]. Acta Anaesthesiogica Scandinavica, 1991,47:449-45.
  • 8Schwender D, Daunderer M, Mulzer S, et al. Spectral Edge Fre- quency of the Electroencephalogram to Monitor "Depth" of Anaes- thesia with Isoflurane or Propofo [J]. British Journal of Anaesthe- sia, 1996,77: 179-184.
  • 9Anonymous. Aspect Medical Battles Standard Practice Loyalty to Sell Monitoring Device[J]. Health Industry Today, 1996,59(12) :7.
  • 10Chan M T, Cheng B C, Lee T M, et al. BIS Guided Anesthesia De- creases Postoperative Delirium and Cognitive Decline [J]. J Neu- rosurg Anesthesiol, 2013,25 ( 1 ) : 33-42.

二级参考文献83

共引文献76

同被引文献6

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部