模糊前端参与对农业高新技术企业产品创新性的影响被引量：1

Research on Impact of Involvement in Fuzzy Front End on Product Innovativeness of High-tech Agricultural Enterprises

下载PDF

导出

摘要以364份农业高新技术企业调查问卷为基础,探讨模糊前端参与对企业产品创新性的影响,并研究网络结构形态的调节效应。实证结果表明,模糊前端参与对企业市场创新性和技术创新性的提升具有显著作用,网络中心性对模糊前端参与和企业市场创新性关系具有正向调节作用,供应商弹性对模糊前端参与和企业市场创新性关系具有负向调节作用。研究结论为我国农业高新技术企业的新产品开发管理提供一定实践指导价值。 This study discusses the effects of involvement in fuzzy front end on technological innovativeness and market innovativeness respectively as well as the moderating effects of network structure configuration.364 survey data from Chinese agricultural high-technique enterprises are used to empirically test the hypotheses.The results show that supplier involvement in fuzzy front end has a positive effect on product innovativeness.Network centrality positively affects the relationship between involvement fuzzy front end and technological innovativeness.Supplier flexibility negatively affects the relationship between involvement fuzzy front end and product innovativeness.The study conclusions provide theoretical guidance for the management of new product development.

作者黄聿舟裴旭东

机构地区西安石油大学经济管理学院

出处《西北农林科技大学学报（社会科学版）》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第1期81-88,共8页 Journal of Northwest A&F University(Social Science Edition)

基金国家自然科学基金项目(71372172) 教育部人文社会科学基金项目(11YJA630100) 陕西省社会科学基金项目(13Q070) 陕西省软科学研究计划面上项目(2015KRM044)

关键词模糊前端参与网络结构形态技术创新性市场创新性 involvement in fuzzy front end network structure configuration technological innovativeness market innovativeness

分类号 F324 [经济管理—产业经济]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献21

1Griffiths-Hemans J, Grover R. Setting the Stage for Creative New Products: Investigating the Idea Frui- tion ProeessEJ2. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,2006,34 (1) :27-39.
2Alam I. Removing the Fuzziness From the Fuzzy Front- end of Service Innovations Through Customer Interac- tionsEJ~. Industrial Marketing Management, 2006,35 (4) :468-480.
3Azadegan A,Dooley K J, Carter PL, et al. Supplier In- novativeness and the role of Interorganizational Learn- ing in Enhancing Manufacturer Capabilities EJ~. Jour- nal of Supply Chain Management, 2008,44 (4) : 14-35.
4Kurkkio M. Managing the Fuzzy Front-end: Insights From Process Firms~J~. European Journal of Innova- tion Management,2011,14 (2) :252-269.
5Adner R,Kapoor R. Value Creation in Innovation Eco- systems: How the Structure of Technological Interde- pendence Affects Firm Performance in New Technolo- gy Generations ~J~. Strategic Management Journal, 2010,31 (3): 306-333.
6Acur N, Kandemir D, Boer H. Strategic Alignment and New Product Development: Drivers and Perform- ance Effects EJ~. Journal of Product Innovation Man- agement, 2012, 29 (2): 304-318.
7Azadegan A, Dooley K J. Supplier Innovativeness, Organizational Learning Styles and Manufacturer Per- formance: An Empirical Assessment EJ~. Journal of Operations Management, 2010, 28 (6): 488-505.
8Capaldo A. Network Structure and Innovation: The Leveraging of A Dual Network as a Distinctive Rela- tional capability [J~. Strategic Management Journal, 2007, 28 (6): 585-608.
9Thomas R W, Fugate B S, Koukova N T. Coping With Time Pressure and Knowledge Sharing in Buyer- supplier Relationships ~J~. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 2011, 47 (3): 22-42.
10Tsai W P. Knowledge Transfer in Intraorganizational networks: Effects of Network Position and Absorp- tive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and Per- formance F J~. Academy of Management Journal, 2001, 44 (5): 996-1 004.