期刊文献+

基于ANT理论的信用卡风险管理研究 被引量:5

下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过对信用卡发卡、用卡阶段风险形成机理的分析,展示信用卡风险管理过程中异质行动者在转译活动中的利益和风险关系,运用行动者网络理论,细分信用卡风险管理网络中各行动者承担的角色,明晰行动者网络的转译环节,厘清行动者正负能量的转变对行动者网络转译的影响。研究表明:核心行动者是信用卡风险管理的关键主体,征召行动者是信用卡风险管理的必要补充,终极行动者是信用卡风险管理的有力保障,非征召行动者是信用卡风险管理的外部基础。 The article used the actor network theory, analyzed the formation mechanism of risk issuing and using the credit card, revealed the benefit and risk relationship of heterogeneous actors in the process of translation activities in the credit card risk management, and subdivided the role assumed by the network actors, and analyzed the translation process of the actors in the stage of issuing and using the credit card, and clarified that the actors' positive and negative energy transform affected the actor network translation. The research shows that: the core actor is the key subject of the risk management of credit card, the enlist actor is a necessary supplement to the risk management of credit card, the ultimate actor is strong guarantee for the risk management of credit card and non-enlisted actor is the external foundation of risk management of credit card.
作者 高芙蓉
出处 《金融理论与实践》 北大核心 2016年第1期61-66,共6页 Financial Theory and Practice
基金 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目<新兴产业集聚的公共环境培育研究>(NKZXA1406)
关键词 行动者网络理论 角色细分 信用卡 风险管理 actor network theory role segmentation credit card risk management
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献43

  • 1卢晖临,李雪.如何走出个案——从个案研究到扩展个案研究[J].中国社会科学,2007(1):118-130. 被引量:321
  • 2郭俊立.巴黎学派的行动者网络理论及其哲学意蕴评析[J].自然辩证法研究,2007,23(2):104-108. 被引量:127
  • 3帕特南.民主运转起来[M].王列,赖海榕译.南昌:江西人民出版社,2001:195.
  • 4R. Williams and D. Edge, The Social Shaping of Technology, Research Policy, No. 25,1996, p. 868.
  • 5T.J. Pinch and W. E. Bijker, The Social Construction of Facts and Artifacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other,Social Studies of Science, 14, 1984, p. 428.
  • 6T.J. Pinch and W. E. Bijker, The Social Construction of Facts and Artifacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other,Social Studies of Science, 14, 1984,p. 429.
  • 7T.J. Pinch and W. E. Bijker, The Social Construction of Facts and Artifacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other,in W. E. Bijker,T. P. Hughes and T. Pinch (eds.), The Social Construction of Technological Systems:New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1987, pp. 30 - 44.
  • 8R. Kline and T. Pinch, The Social Construction of Technology, in D. MacKenzy and J. Wajcman( eds. ), The Social Shaping of Technology, Open University Press, 1999, p. 113.
  • 9J. McLaughlin, et al. , Valuing Technology: Organizations, Culture, and Change, London ; New York : Routledge, 1999, p. 42.
  • 10T.J. Pinch and W. E. Bijker, The Social Construction of Facts and Artifacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other,Social Studies of Science, 14, 1984, pp. 399 - 441.

共引文献28

同被引文献15

引证文献5

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部