期刊文献+

试论中国史学史研究的学术穿透力

Academic Penetration of the Research on the History of Historiography of China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 史学史学科具有评论以往历史学发展状况的内在功能,面对复杂多样的研讨对象,需要将思维突破本专业的界限,即具备很强的学术穿透力,才能完成其学术研究的任务。中国历史学在发展进程中,积累了不少偏差和扭曲,需要中国史学史学科在总结与评判中予以纠正。中国史学史的学术穿透力,还可以表现为在一般历史问题的探索中,发现和提出其他史学专业未能达到的思路,得出创新的论断。因此,加强史学史的学科建设,是十分必要的。 The discipline of the history of historiography has its internal function to comment the past state of development of the history studies. Facing to the complicated and volatile research objects, we need to break our thinking patterns through our own major boundaries, that is to have a strong academic penetration, in order to finish the tasks of academic research. In developing,Chinese history studies accumulate quite a few of errors and deviations, which is needed to be corrected by the summation and criticism of the discipline of the history of Chinese historiography. Through discovering and proposing some train of thoughts which are not to be found by the other majors related to the history studies, the academic penetration of the history of Chinese historiography can draw a creative conclusion in exploring the general history problems. Because of these, it is necessary to strengthen the discipline constructions on the history of historiography.
作者 乔治忠
出处 《淮阴师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2016年第1期3-10,139,共8页 Journal of Huaiyin Teachers College(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 学术穿透力 史学史 史学评论 逻辑 academic penetration the history of historiography comment on the history studies logic
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献48

共引文献64

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部