期刊文献+

邻近强电线路时埋地管道交流腐蚀的可能性评估

Assessment of AC-corrosion Possibility of Buried Pipelines with Adjacent Strong Electric Lines
下载PDF
导出
摘要 强电线路与埋地管道共用一个走廊时管道上不可避免地产生次生交流干扰。当这一交流干扰电流密度达到一定极限后便会造成管道的交流腐蚀,危及管道设备乃至人身的安全。提出了管道上交流腐蚀的条件及控制指标的新观点,并对管道交流腐蚀的可能性进行评估。 The induced alternative interference current generated on buried pipelines is inevitable when the buried pipelines are paralleled with strong electric lines in a relative short distance. AC-corrosion will occur on the buried pipelines when the density of the induced alternative interference current reaches a specific limit value. This phenomenon will jeopardize the buried pipelines and even threaten the personal safety. A new standpoint about the AC-corrosion conditions and its control index are proposed. More importantly, the AC-corrosion possibility of buried pipelines is properly assessed.
出处 《腐蚀与防护》 CAS 北大核心 2016年第1期47-50,91,共5页 Corrosion & Protection
关键词 强电线路 埋地管道 交流干扰 交流腐蚀 限值 strong electric line buried pipeline AC interference AC corrosiom limit value
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1尹可华.工频电场作用下的金属腐蚀[Z].[出版地不详]:成都科技大学管道干扰科研组,1979.
  • 2ISO 15589-1-2003 Petroleum and natural gas indus- tries-cathodic protection of pipeline transportation systems-on-land pipelines[S].
  • 3CEN/TS 15280:2006 Evaluation of a. c. corrosion likelihood of buried pipelines-application to cathodically protected pipelines[S].
  • 4CEOCOR 2000 A.C. corrosion on cathodically pro- tected pipelines guidelines for risk assessment and miti- gation measures[S].
  • 5GB/T50698-2011埋地钢质管道交流干扰防护技术标准[S].
  • 6胡士信,路民旭,杜艳霞,窦宏强,张本革,闫明珍,郑安升,廖煜炤.管道交流腐蚀的新观点[J].腐蚀与防护,2010,31(6):419-424. 被引量:45
  • 7董亮,路民旭,杜艳霞,姜子涛.埋地管道交流腐蚀的研究进展[J].中国腐蚀与防护学报,2011,31(3):173-178. 被引量:33
  • 8郭剑,曹玉杰,胡士信,陆家榆.交流输电线路对输油输气管道电磁影响的限值[J].电网技术,2008,32(2):17-20. 被引量:56
  • 9贝克曼,施文克,普林兹.阴极保护手册-电化学保护的理论与实践[J].胡士信,王向农,译.北京:化学工业出版社,2005.
  • 10中国科学院福建物质结构研究所二部金属腐蚀与防护组.交流电对地下油气管道电化学腐蚀及其阴极保护的影响[J].金属腐蚀与防护,1977(1):20-29.

二级参考文献66

  • 1贝克曼WV,施文克W,普林兹W.阴极保护手册-电化学保护的理论与实践[M].胡士信,王向农,译.北京:化学工业出版社,2005.
  • 2ISO 15589-1-2003, Petroleum and natural gas industries-Cathodic protection of pipeline transportation systems-on-land pipelines[S]. 2003.
  • 3CEN/TS 15280: 2006, Evaluation of a. c. corrosion likelihood of buried pipelines-application to cathodically protected pipelines[S]. 2006.
  • 4CEOCOR. A. C. Corrosion on cathodically protected pipelines guidelines for risk assessment and mitigation measures[M]. Roma, APCE:2001.
  • 5NACE TG 327 2007-02-08, AC corrosion state-of-theart:Corrosion rate, mechanism, and mitigation requirements[S]. 2008.
  • 6Frazier M J, Barlo T J. Influence of AC from power lines on the cathodic protection of steel in groundwater solu- tions [A]. Corrosion/1996 [C]. Houston, TX: NACE, 1996, paper No.96210.
  • 7Yunovich M, Thompson N G. AC corrosion: corrosion rate and mitigation requirements [A]. Corrosion/2004 [C]. Houston, TX: NACE, 2004, paper No.04206.
  • 8Nielsen L V. Role of alkalization in AC induced corrosion of pipelines and concequences hereof in relation to CP re- quirements [A]. Corrosion/2005 [C]. Houston, TX: NACE, 2005, paper No.05188.
  • 9Ragault I. AC corrosion induced by V.H.V. electrical lines on polyethylene coated steel gas pipelines [A]. Corro- sion/1998 [C]. Houston, TX: NACE,1998, paper No.98557.
  • 10Ormellese M, Lazzari L, Goidanich S, et al. CP criteria assessment in the presence of AC interference [A]. Corro- sion/2008 [C]. Houston, TX: NACE, 2008, paper No.08064.

共引文献133

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部