期刊文献+

论我国行政垄断法律责任体系的构建

On the Legal Liability System Construction of Administrative Monopoly in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 现行反行政垄断立法对行政垄断法律责任的规定存在责任形式单一、责任体系不健全,责任程度轻微、责任方式不具有针对性,责任追究主体缺失或不明、责任无法具体落实等问题,有些法规甚至没有规定法律责任。应构建行政责任、民事责任、刑事责任三位一体的行政垄断法律责任体系。行政垄断的主要责任是行政责任,应建立反垄断执法机构直接追究行政垄断主体行政责任的外部追究体制。行政垄断损害赔偿责任不宜纳入行政赔偿范围,将其作为民事损害赔偿责任处理,更有利于保护消费者和其他合法经营者的权利。由于行政垄断严重的社会危害性,应规定行政垄断的刑事责任,并实行双罚制。 Current legislation on anti-administrative monopoly exist many problems: single liability form, unsound liability system, light the degree of liability, untargeted liability manner, lack or uncertain of liability body, liability cannot be carry out, even some rules lack of legal liability. We should build the Legal Liability System of administrative monopoly by administrative liability, civil liability, and criminal liability. The main liability of administrative monopoly is the administrative liability and we should construct external system with which the anti-monopoly enforcement authority shall affix administrative liability of administrative monopoly main body. Administrative monopoly damages responsibility should not be included in the scope of administrative compensation, as a civil liability for damages help to protecting the rights of consumers and other legitimate operators. Because of the serious social harmfulness of administrative monopoly, we should provide the criminal responsibility of administrative monopoly, and adopts a double punishment system.
作者 杨慧
机构地区 江苏警官学院
出处 《天水行政学院学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2015年第6期95-99,共5页 Journal of Tianshui College of Administration
基金 江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(PAPD) 江苏省高校哲学社会科学研究基金项目(2012SJD820005) 江苏警官学院科学研究项目(11y04)
关键词 行政垄断 行政责任 民事责任 刑事责任 administrative monopoly administrative responsibility civil responsibility criminal responsibility
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献87

共引文献299

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部