期刊文献+

生态福利绩效视角下的上海市可持续发展评价研究 被引量:28

EVALUATION ON SUSTAINABLE URBAN DEVELOPMENT FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF ECOLOGICAL WELLBEING PERFORMANCE——A CASE STUDY OF SHANGHAI
原文传递
导出
摘要 资源与环境约束加剧的大背景下,在“生态门槛”内实现社会福利最大化的可持续发展模式是未来城市发展的必然选择。从生态福利绩效视角出发,选取人均生态足迹和人类发展指数构建城市可持续发展评价指标体系,并采用DEA方法计算二者的投入产出效率,对上海市1999-2012年可持续发展水平进行多维度、动态化的实证分析。研究发现:1上海市人类发展指数、人均生态足迹与经济发展同步增长,但人均生态足迹水平大于生态承载能力,处于严重“生态赤字”状态,并不断恶化;2上海市多数年份的生态福利绩效处于DEA无效状态,且2005年以来进入规模收益递减通道。最后提出政策建议。 Under the condition of limited resources and environment protection, there is an urgent need to conduct sustainable urban development to maximize so6ietal wellbe!ng within the "Ecological Threshold". This research is conducted by appraising the efficiency of sustainable development in Shanghai from the year of 1999 to 2012, from the perspective of ecological wellbeing performance based on the DEA models. In this research, the input index is the ecological footprint per capita, and HDI is the output index. The results demonstrate that a higher level of economic growth along with a higher cost of environment and performance in most years are DEA inefficient except for the year of 2004. Last, some constructive suggestions will be proposed for Shanghai's sustainable development in the next coming years.
出处 《长江流域资源与环境》 CAS CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2016年第1期9-15,共7页 Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin
基金 2012年国家社科基金重大项目(12&ZD026) 2013年上海软科学研究基金重点课题(13692180100)~~
关键词 生态福利绩效 可持续发展 生态足迹 人类发展指数 DEA ecological wellbeing performance sustainable urban development HDI ecological footprint DEA
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1BRUNTLAND G H. Our Common Future:the World Commission on Environment and Development[M]. Oxford:Oxford University Press, 1987.
  • 2诸大建,张帅.生态福利绩效与深化可持续发展的研究[J].同济大学学报(社会科学版),2014,25(5):106-115. 被引量:72
  • 3OECD. Core Set of Indicators for Environmental Performance Reviews[M]. Paris:OECD, 1993.
  • 4DALY H E, COBB J B. For the Common Good:Redirecting the Economy Toward Community, the Environment and A Sustainable Future[M]. Boston:Beacon Press, 1989:401-455.
  • 5COBB C, HALSTEAD T, ROWE J. If the GDP is up, why is America down?[Z]. The Atlantic Monthly, 1995:59-78.
  • 6United Nations Development Programme. Human Development Report 1990[M]. New York:Oxford University Press, 1990:10.
  • 7SEN A K. Distribution, transitivity and little's welfare criteria[J]. The Economic Journal, 1963, 73(292):771-778.
  • 8REES W E. Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity:what Urban economics leaves out[J]. Environment and Urbanization, 1992, 4(2):121-130.
  • 9The Global Leaders of Tomorrow Environment Task Force. 2002 Environmental sustainability index[R]. Davos, Switzerland:World Economic Forum Annual Meeting, 2002.
  • 10SUPACHET C. The evaluation of the sustainable human development:a cross-country analysis employing slack-Based DEA[J]. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 2014(20):3-11.

二级参考文献122

共引文献302

同被引文献327

引证文献28

二级引证文献223

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部