期刊文献+

侧路融合术治疗退变性腰椎侧凸的临床疗效分析 被引量:5

原文传递
导出
摘要 [目的]探讨侧路融合术治疗退变性腰椎侧凸的临床疗效。[方法]2012年3月-2014年6月退变性腰椎侧凸的患者28例,男17例,女11例;年龄55—71岁,平均(65.7±13.58)岁。采用侧路融合术Cross—Fuse假体置入。[结果]平均随访22个月(10—34个月),随访期间腰椎冠状面及矢状面序列矫正度数及椎间孔平均高度、椎间隙平均高度未见明显丢失,融合器无移位,未见假关节形成。末次随访腰痛及腿痛VAS评分、ODI功能障碍指数评分均较术前低,且差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.001),提示腰痛及腿痛等症状经手术治疗后有所改善。手术后腰椎冠状面及矢状面Cobb角较手术前有所降低,而术后腰椎侧方滑移度、椎间孑L平均高度和椎间隙平均高度则有所提高,差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.001)。[结论]侧路融合术治疗退变性腰椎侧凸临床效果较好。
出处 《中国矫形外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第3期274-277,共4页 Orthopedic Journal of China
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Gupta MC. Degenerative scoliosis. Options for surgical management [J]. Orthop Clin North Am,2003,34(2) :269 -279.
  • 2Simmons ED. Surgical treatment of patients with lumbar spinal steno- sis with associated scoliosis [ J ]. Clin Orthop, 2001,384 ( 384 ) : 45 -53.
  • 3Silva FE, Lenke LG. Adult degenerative scoliosis: valuation and management [ J ]. Neurosurg Focus,2010,28 (3) : 1 - 16.
  • 4李方财,陈其昕,陈维善,徐侃,吴琼华,韩斌.选择性经椎间孔椎间融合结合后路融合术治疗退行性腰椎侧凸[J].中华骨科杂志,2009,29(9):806-810. 被引量:6
  • 5Ploumis A, Transfledt EE, Denis F. Degenerative lumbar scoliosis as- sociated with spinal stenosis [ J ]. Spine J,2007,7 ( 11 ) :428 - 436.
  • 6Crawford CH 3ra, Glassman SD. Surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis associated with adult scoliosis [ J]. Instr Course Lect,2009, 58:669 - 676.
  • 7Edwards CC 2nd, Bridwell KH, Patel A, et aL Long adultdeformity fu- sions to L and the sacrurfL A matched cohort analysis [ J ]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976 ) ,2004,29 ( 18 ) : 1996 - 2005.
  • 8Polly DW Jr,Hamill CL, Bridwell KH. Debate: to fuse or not to fuse to the sacrum, the fate of the L5 S1 disc [ J ]. Spine (Phila Pa1976 ) , 2006,31 (19) :179 - 184.
  • 9Cho KJ,Suk SI,Park SR,et al. Risk factors of sagittal decompensa- tion after long posterior instrumentation and fusion for degenerative lumbar scoliosis [ J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976 ) ,2010,35 ( 17 ) : 1595 - 1601.

二级参考文献14

  • 1陈维善,朱丹杰,陈其昕,吴琼华,徐侃,陈正形.经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术的初步疗效[J].中华外科杂志,2005,43(16):1102-1103. 被引量:13
  • 2Glassman SD, Berven S, Bridwell K, et al. Correlation of radiographic parameters and clinical symptoms in adult scoliosis. Spine, 2005, 30(6): 682-688.
  • 3Pateder DB, Kebaish KM, Caseio BM, et al. Posterior only versus combined anterior and posterior approaches to lumbar scoliosis in adults: a radiographic analysis. Spine, 2007, 32(14): 1551-1554.
  • 4Hashimoto T, Shigenobu K, Kanayama M, et al. Clinical results of single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion using the Brantigan I/F carbon cage filled with a mixture of local morselized bone and bioactive ceramic granules. Spine, 2002, 27(3): 258-262.
  • 5Aebi M. The adult scoliosis. Eur Spine J, 2005, 14(10): 925-948.
  • 6Hasegawa K, Homma T. One-stage three-dimensional correction and fusion: a multilevel posterior lumbar interbody fusion procedure for degenerative lumbar kyphoscoliosis. J Neurosurg, 2003, 99(1 Suppl): S125-131.
  • 7Kuklo TR. Principles for selecting fusion levels in adult spinal deformity with particular attention to tumbar curves and double major curves. Spine, 2006, 31 (19 Suppl): S132-138.
  • 8Glassman SD, Bridwell K, Dimar JR, et al. The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity. Spine, 2005, 30(18):2024-2029.
  • 9Hackenberg L, Halm H, Bullmann V, et al. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a safe technique with satisfactory three to five year results. Eur Spine J, 2005, 14(6): 551-558.
  • 10Schwab FJ, Smith VA, Biserni M, et al. Adult scoliosis: a quantitative radiographic and clinical analysis. Spine, 2002, 27(4): 387- 392.

共引文献5

同被引文献31

引证文献5

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部