期刊文献+

考虑认知不确定性的模型确认贝叶斯因子法 被引量:1

Bayes factor for model validation under epistemic uncertainty
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对认知不确定性条件下计算机建模仿真所面临的模型确认问题,提出一种结合了二阶概率法与区间数排序的改进贝叶斯模型确认方法。该方法首先采用二阶概率法对模型的不确定性进行量化,量化结果被作为先验模型输出,再基于实验数据对模型输出的先验概率密度进行贝叶斯更新,最后通过区间数排序的方式对比模型输出的后验和先验概率密度。由此所得的贝叶斯因子能够在模型存在认知不确定性的情况下为模型确认提供可信的结果。算例分析结果显示了该方法的合理性。 Considering computer model validation under epistemic uncertainty, this paper developed an improved Bayesian model validation method which combined the second order probability method and the interval number rank method. The meth- od first accomplished the model uncertainty quantification by the second order probability method. Then it updated the prior model response computed from uncertainty quantification based on experimental observation using Bayesian theory. Finally it used the method for ranking interval numbers to contrast the posterior probability density of the model response with the prior probability density. The obtained Bayes factor provided a credible result for model validation under epistemic uncertainty. Simu- lation results show that the ~resented method is rational.
作者 赵亮 杨战平
出处 《计算机应用研究》 CSCD 北大核心 2016年第2期473-477,共5页 Application Research of Computers
基金 国防预研项目 中国工程物理研究院科学技术发展基金项目(2012B0403058)
关键词 认知不确定性 模型确认 二阶概率方法 区间数排序 贝叶斯因子 epistemic uncertainty model validation second-order probability method method for ranking interval num-bers Bayes factor
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Trucano T G,Swiler L P,Igusa T,et al.Calibration,validation,and sensitivity analysis:what’s what[J].Reliability Engineering and System Safety,2006,91(10-11):1331-1357.
  • 2Roy C J,Oberkampf W L.A comprehensive framework for verification,validation,and uncertainty quantification in scientific computing[J].Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering,2011,200(25-28):2131-2144.
  • 3Sankararaman S,Mahadevan S.Comprehensive framework for integration of calibration,verification and validation[C]//Proc of the 53th AIAA Structures,Structural Dynamics Materials Conference.[S.l.] :AIAA,2012.
  • 4Sankararaman S,Mahadevan S.Assessing the reliability of computational models under uncertainty[C]//Proc of the 54th AIAA Structures,Structural Dynamics Materials Conference.[S.l.] :AIAA,2013.
  • 5Ling You,Mahadevan S.Quantitative model validation techniques:new insights[J].Reliability Engineering and System Safety,2013,111(2013):217-231.
  • 6Liu Yu,Chen Wei,Arendt P,et al.Toward a better understanding of model validation metrics[J].Journal of Mechanical Design,2011,133(7):48-60.
  • 7Rebba R,Mahadevan S.Computational methods for model reliability assessment[J].Reliability Engineering and System Safety,2008,93(8):1197-1207.
  • 8Oberkampf W L,Barone M F.Measures of agreement between computation and experiment:validation metrics[J].Journal of Computational Physics,2006,217(1):5-36.
  • 9Hills R G,Trucano T G.Statistical validation of engineering and scientific models:a maximum likelihood based metric,SAND2001-1783[R].Albuquerque:Sandia National Laboratories,2002.
  • 10Cao Jian,Chen Wei,Baghdasaryan L,et al.Approaches for model validation:methodology and illustration on a sheet metal flanging process[J].Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering,2006,128(2):588-597.

二级参考文献10

  • 1Pilch M, Trucano T, Moya J L, et al. Guidelines for Sandia ASCI Verification and Validation Plans, Content and Format: Version 2.0 [R]// Sandia National Laboratories Report, Albuquerque, New Mexico, SAND2000-3101, January, 2001.
  • 2Trucano T, Pilch M, Oberkampf W O. General Concepts for Experimental Validation of ASCI Code Applications [R]// Sandia National Laboratories Report, Albuquerque, New Mexico, SAND 2002-0341, March, 2002.
  • 3AIAA. Guide for the Verification and Validation of Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations. [K]//AIAA-G-077-1998. Reston, VA: AIAA, 1998.
  • 4Easterling R G., Berger J. Statistical Foundations for the Validation of Computer Models [R]// Sandia National Laboratories Report, Albuquerque, New Mexico, SAND2003-0287, 2003.
  • 5Bayarri M J, Berger J O, Higdon D, et al. A Framework for Validation of Computer Models [R]// Technical Report Number 128, National Institute of Statistical Sciences, North Carolina, 2002.
  • 6Berger J O. Statistical decision theory and Bayesian analysis [M]. New York: Springer-Verlag, Inc. 1985.
  • 7达庆利,刘新旺.区间数线性规划及其满意解[J].系统工程理论与实践,1999,19(4):3-7. 被引量:139
  • 8徐泽水.AHP中两类标度的关系研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,1999,19(7):97-101. 被引量:176
  • 9徐泽水.模糊互补判断矩阵排序的一种算法[J].系统工程学报,2001,16(4):311-314. 被引量:581
  • 10徐泽水.广义模糊一致性矩阵及其排序方法[J].解放军理工大学学报(自然科学版),2000,1(6):97-99. 被引量:24

共引文献87

同被引文献11

引证文献1

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部