期刊文献+

标准必要专利禁令行为的反垄断规制探析 被引量:16

Investigation on Anti-monopoly Regulation of Injunction of SEP
下载PDF
导出
摘要 寻求和实施禁令本是专利权人的一项基本权利,但标准却可为标准必要专利持有人不正当行使这一权利提供平台,成为其实施反竞争行为的工具。持有人不当寻求和实施禁令的行为导致的排除、限制竞争效果是反垄断规制的正当性基础。作为私权与公益激烈交锋的场域之一,标准必要专利持有人不当行使禁令行为的反垄断规制,关涉知识产权保护与市场自由竞争之间的协调与平衡。在适用禁止滥用市场支配地位的相关制度来规制专利持有人的禁令行为时,执法机构可以从持有人、被控侵权者以及消费者三个主体维度出发,综合考虑各自的相关因素,以充分发挥反垄断法的规制功效。 Seeking and enforcing injunction is one of the fundamental rights for a patent holder, but a standard could act as a platform for a SEP holder to unreasonably exercise this kind of right, resulting in the effect of eliminating or restricting competition, and ultimately destroying competition order and consumers' welfare. It is the anti-competitive effects that warrant anti-monopoly rules to get involved in the conflicting area of interface between exercise of private right and public interest protection. When applying the prohibition regulations of abusing market dominant position under Anti-monopoly Law, antitrust authorities could take into account relevant elements concerning SEP holders, the alleged infringers as well as consumers, in order to bring the outcome of anti-monopoly regulation into full play.
作者 韩伟 徐美玲
出处 《知识产权》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第1期84-89,共6页 Intellectual Property
基金 2013年国家社科基金青年项目"合并救济中限制性条件的匹配性研究" 2011年国家社科基金重大项目"中国云计算知识产权问题与对策研究" 2012年国家社科基金重大项目"垄断认定过程中的相关市场边界划分与技术研究"的阶段性成果
关键词 标准必要专利 禁令 滥用 反垄断 standard-essential patent injunction abuse anti-monopoly
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1韩伟.美国《横向合并指南》的最新修订及启示[J].现代法学,2011,33(3):151-164. 被引量:14
  • 2张永忠,王绎淩.标准必要专利诉讼的国际比较:诉讼类型与裁判经验[J].知识产权,2015,25(3):84-91. 被引量:21
  • 3俞风雷,沈宗阳.规制知识产权滥用的私法路径分析[J].知识产权,2015,25(4):101-106. 被引量:12
  • 4[美]亚当.杰夫、乔希·勒纳编著:《创新及其不满:专利体系对创新与进步的危害及对策》,罗建平、兰花译,中国人民大学出版社2007年版,第136页.
  • 5Guido Calabresi and A. Douglas Melamed, Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral, Harvard Law Review Volume 85, April 1972.
  • 6Case AT.39985-Motorola-Enforcement of GPRS Standard Essential Patents, Commission Decision of 29 April 2014 ( see IP 14/489 ) , P76 Para. 429-430.
  • 7CJEU, Judgment of the Court ( Fiflh Chamber ) in Case C-170/13, 16 July 2015, 77 ( 2 ) .
  • 8KFTC, Review Guidelines on Unfair Exercise of Intellectual Property Rights, Point 5.B. [ Note 1 ] .
  • 9CJEU, Judgment of the Court ( Fifth Chamber) in Case C-170/13, 16 July 2015, 77 ( 1 ) .
  • 10KFTC, Review Guidelines on Unfair Exercise of Intellectual Property Rights, Point 7.

二级参考文献57

共引文献43

同被引文献134

引证文献16

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部