摘要
当国家安全以及重大经济利益与专利权公开冲突的时候,保密专利或者发明制度就显示出其存在的合理性。尽管中美两国分属"保密不授权"与"保密授权"两种模式,但在保密发明的公共政策、立法体系与原则、权利救济等方面,美国的立法与实践对我国有一定的借鉴和启发作用,包括行政补偿和解密在内的保密发明制度仍旧有健全和完善的相当空间。
When national security and substantial economic interest are conflict with patent disclosure, confidential patent or invention system shows the rationality of its existence. Although China and US belong respectively to models of "secrecy without authorization" and "secrecy with authorization", in the aspect of public policy, legislation system and principle, the right remedy, etc., the legislation and practice in the United States play a certain role of reference and inspiration to our country. The secrecy invention system that contains administrative compensation and decryption still has considerable space for perfection.
出处
《知识产权》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第1期134-140,共7页
Intellectual Property
关键词
保密发明
公共政策
行政补偿
权利救济
解密
secrecy invention
public policy
administrative compensation
right relief
decryption