网络服务提供者共同侵权连带责任之反思——兼论未来民法典的理性定位

Internet Service Provider's Joint Liability Due to Joint Tort and the Rationale of Chinese Civil Code

依据《侵权责任法》第36条第2、3款的规定以及学界的通说,对于网络侵权行为,网络服务提供者承担共同侵权的连带责任。但是,连带责任性质的认定忽略了法律的效率价值与公平价值的平衡,忽略了请求权顺位的考量,也破坏了连带责任规则体系的严谨性;不仅如此,还导致了理论上与适用上的诸多难题。中国未来民法典应当以受害人对网络服务提供者的不当得利返还请求权取代共同侵权连带责任请求权,以达到法律的公平价值与效率价值完美的平衡。

According to Item 2 and 3 in Article 36 of Chinese Tort Liability Lawand academic consensus,internet service provider may assume joint liability due to joint internet tort. Nevertheless,the recognition of the joint liability fails to maintain the equilibrium between efficiency and just,ignores the priority issue among different claimants,and jeopardizes the coherence of the tort liability law. What's more,a great number of cumbersome theoretical and practical problems also arise. To replace the joint liability approach with an unjust enrichment solution may serve well to achieve both efficiency and just.