“六黄太尉”是“黄太尉”吗?——兼答“集体”“陋儒”说

Liu Huang Taiwei and Huang Taiwei:Is The Golden Lotus( Jin Ping Mei) a Collective Work or a Slipshod Work?

长期以来,不少学者因《金瓶梅》里诸多的矛盾和错乱对其一直存有误解,以为其系集体或下级文人粗制滥造之作。在第六十五回里,"黄太尉"和"六黄太尉"迭现,因一字之增减,两者混用数次,仿佛笔误,是小说中的矛盾和错乱,实际上是作者徐渭为了遮掩却又不愿意完全违背事实真相而故意留给我们的潜台词。

Some scholars,puzzled by contradictions and errors in The Golden Lotus,have misunderstood that the novel had been collectively written or a slipshod work by some low-ranking literati. By analyzing an example of Liu Huang Taiwei and Huang Taiwei in Chapter 65,an example appears to be an obvious error,this article demonstrates that the so-called contradictions and errors in this novel are actually the implicit clues that the author XU Wei deliberately left for revealing truth that he was forced to hide.