期刊文献+

格拉斯哥预后评分对食管胃结合部腺癌患者预后的的预测价值 被引量:3

Value of Glasgow prognostic score in patients with adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价格拉斯哥预后评分(GPS)对于食管胃结合部腺癌(AEG)患者预后的预测价值。方法回顾性分析2007年1月至2010年3月间在河南省人民医院接受外科手术治疗的322例AEG患者的临床资料。根据C反应蛋白(CRP)和血清白蛋白(ALB)水平,进行GPS评分。分别进行单因素和多因素分析评估GPS评分对预后的预测作用。结果322例AEG患者GPS评分为0分者192例,1分者104例,2分者26例。全组中位随访时间37(4~73)月。GPS0、1和2分者中位无瘤生存时间分别为47.0(95%CI:31.6.62.4)月、15.0(95%C1:11.8。18.2)月和4.7(95%c,:3.8~5.6)月,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01)。中位总生存时间GPS0分者未达到,GPS1分和2分者分别为20.6(95%CI:15.8~25.4)月和7.0(95%CI:5.8—8.2)Yl,差异有统计学意义60〈0.01)。多因素预后分析证实,GPS评分是AEG患者无瘤生存及总体生存的独立预后因素(均P〈0.01)。结论GPS是预测AEG患者预后的有效指标。 Objective To evaluate the prognosis and predictive values of preoperative Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) for adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (AEG) patients. Methods A retrospective study of 322 AEG patients who received operation between January 2007 and March 2010 in Henan Provincial People's Hospital was performed. Clinical data, pathological characteristics, laboratory parameters and survival data were collected. The GPS was calculated based on C-reactive protein (CRP) and serum albumin (ALB) levels. Univariate and multivariate analysis were used to evaluate the prognostic value of GPS. Results Among 322 patients, 0, 1, 2 of GPS were 192, 104 and 26 patients respectively. The median follow-up was 37 (4-73) months. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, median diseases-free survival (DFS) of GPS 0, 1, 2 was 47.0 (95% CI:31.6-62.4), 15.0 (95% CI: 11.8-8.2) and 4.7 (95% CI: 3.8-5.6) months (P 〈 0.01), and median overall survival (OS) was out of reach, 20.6 (95% CI: 15.8-25.4) and 7.0 (95% CI: 5.8-8.2) months (P 〈 0.01). Univariate and multivariate analysis revealed that GPS was an independent predictor of DFS (P 〈 0.01) and OS (P 〈 0.01) of AEG. Conclusion GPS is an effective predictor of survival in AEG.
出处 《中华胃肠外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第1期54-57,共4页 Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
关键词 食管胃结合部腺癌 格拉斯哥评分 预后 Adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction Glasgow prognostic score Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Siegel R, Naishadham 0, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013[J].CA Cancer J Clin, 2013 ,63(1): 11-30. DOl: 10.3322/caac.21166.
  • 2He YT, Hou J, Chen ZF, et al. Trends in incidence of esophageal and gastric cardia cancer in high-risk areas in China [J]. EurJ Cancer Prev, 2008,17(2): 71-76. DOl: 1O.1097/CEJ. ObO 13e3282b6fd97.
  • 3Rieder F, Biancani P, Harnett K, et al. Inflammatory mediators in gastroesophageal reflux disease: impact on esophageal motility, fibrosis, and carcinogenesis [J]. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, 2010,298 (5) : G571-G581. DOl: 1O.1l52/ajpgi.00454. 2009.
  • 4Roxburgh CS, McMillan DC. Cancer and systemic inflammation: treat the tumour and treat the host [J]. Br J Cancer, 2014, 11 0 (6): 1409-1412.001: 1O.1038/bjc.2014.90.
  • 5RUdiger Siewert J, Feith M, Werner M, et al. Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: results of surgical therapy based on anatomical/topographic classification in 1 ,002consecutive patients[J]. Ann Surg, 2000,232(3) :353-361.
  • 6Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1 )[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2009,45 (2) : 228-247. DOl: 10. 1016/j.ejca.2008. 10.026.
  • 7Gao Y, Huang D. The value of the systematic inflammation?based Glasgow Prognostic Score in patients with gastric cancer: a literature review[J]' J Cancer Res Ther, 2014, 1O( 4): 799-804. DOl: 10.4103/0973-1482.146054.
  • 8F eng JF, Zhao Q, Chen QX. Prognostic significance of Glasgow prognostic score in patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma [J]. Saudi J Gastroenterol, 2014,20(1) :48-53. DOl: 10.4103/1319-3767.126319.
  • 9Dutta S, AI- Mrabt NM, Fullarton GM, et al. A comparison of POSSUM and GPS models in the prediction of post-operative outcome in patients undergoing oesophago-gastric cancerresection [J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2011,18 (10) : 2808-2817. DOl: 10.1245/s10434-011-1676-5.
  • 10Ubukata H, Motohashi G, Tabuchi T, et al. Evaluations of interferon-gamma/interleukin-4 ratio and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio as prognostic indicators in gastric cancer patients [J]. J Surg Oncol, 2010,102(7): 742-747. DOl: 1O.1002/jso.21725.

二级参考文献1

共引文献17

同被引文献22

引证文献3

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部