期刊文献+

全凭静脉麻醉下腹腔镜手术对宫内外同时妊娠结局的影响 被引量:13

Effect of laparoscopic surgery under total intravenous anesthesia on postoperative pregnancy outcomes of heterotopic pregnancies
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨全凭静脉麻醉下腹腔镜手术对体外受精-胚胎移植(IVF-ET)后宫内外同时妊娠者妊娠结局的影响。方法回顾性分析北京大学第三医院生殖医学中心2010年1月至2014年7月收治的宫内外同时妊娠并于全凭静脉麻醉下行腹腔镜手术的患者48例为手术组。随机选取同期IVF—ET后正常妊娠者60例为对照组。比较两组孕妇自然流产率、孕期合并症发生率、早产率、活产率、分娩周数、剖宫产率差异,同时比较新生儿体重、男婴率、Apgar评分等指标的差异。结果手术组自然流产率、妊娠合并症发生率、早产率、剖宫产率、男婴比例分别为14.6%、16.7%、4.2%、82.9%、51.2%,对照组分别为15.0%、18.3%、6.7%、84.3%、52.9%,差异均无统计学意义(χ2=-0.072、-0.241、-0.569、-0.442、-0.163,均P〉0.05)。手术组分娩周数、新生儿体重分别为(38.3±1.7)周、(3394.9±460.7)g,对照组分别为(37.9±1.5)周、(3406.3±512.6)g,差异均无统计学意义(t=1.083、-0.111,均P〉0.05)。手术组新生儿1minApgar评分、5minApgar评分分别为9.6(9.0~10.0)、10(10~10)分,对照组新生儿1minApgar评分、5minApgar评分分别9.5(9.0~10.0)、10(10-10)分,差异均无统计学意义(Z=-0.418、0.000,均P〉0.05)。手术组和对照组活产率均为100%,出生缺陷率均为0。结论全凭静脉麻醉下腹腔镜手术对宫内外同时妊娠结局未见明确的影响。 Objective To evaluate the effects of laparoscopic surgery under total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) on outcomes of heterotopic pregnancies which need to receive laparoscopie procedures. Methods The data of 108 cases of pregnant women in Center of Reproductive Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital were retrospectively analyzed, and divided into two groups according to whether received surgery. Surgery group : 48 pregnant women after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) were diagnosed as heterotopic pregnancies and received laparoscopic procedures under TIVA. Control group: 60 normal pregnant women after IVF-ET. The miscarriage rate, pregnant complications rate, premature birth rate, live birth rate, delivery weeks and cesarean section rate of two groups were compared. Meanwhile, the newborn's weight, male rate, birth defect rate and Apgar score in 1 min and 5 min of the two groups were compared. Results The miscarriage rate, pregnant complications rate, premature birth rate, cesarean section rate, male rate of surgery group were 14.6% , 16.7% ,4.2% ,82. 9% ,51.2% respectively,which were 15.0% , 18. 3% , 6. 7%, 84. 3%, 52. 9% in control group respectively. There were no significant difference between the two groups ( χ2 = - 0. 072, - 0. 241, - 0. 569, - 0. 442, - 0. 163, P 〉 0. 05 ). The delivery weeks and newborn's weight of surgery group were ( 38.3 ± 1.7 ) weeks and ( 3 394. 9 ± 460. 7 ) g respectively ,which were (37.9 ±1.5 ) weeks and ( 3 406. 3 ±512. 6 ) g in control group. There were no significant difference between the two groups ( t = 1. 083, - 0. 111, P 〉 0. 05 ). The 1 min Apgar score and 5 min Apgar score of surgery group were 9. 6 ( 9. 0 - 10. 0), 10 ( 10 - 10 ) scores and were 9. 5 ( 9.0 - 10. 0 ), 10(10- 10) scores in control group. There were no significant difference between the two groups (Z =-0. 418,0. 000, P〉0.05). The live birth rate of two groups were both 100%, and the birth defect rate were both 0. Conclusion Laparoscopic surgery under TIVA has no effect on the outcome of heterotopic pregnancies.
出处 《中华医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第4期293-296,共4页 National Medical Journal of China
关键词 麻醉 静脉 妊娠 腹腔镜 妊娠结局 Anesthesia, intravenous Pregnancy Laparoscopes Pregnancy outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1TalbotK, SimpsonR, PriceN, et al. Heterotopic pregnancy[J].J Obstet Gynaecol, 2011, 31(1):7–12. DOI:10.3109/01443615.2010.522749.
  • 2BugattoF, Quintero-PradoR, Kirk-GroharJ, et al. Heterotopic triplets: tubal ectopic and twin intrauterine pregnancy. A review of obstetric outcomes with a case report[J].Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2010, 282(6):601–606. DOI:10.1007/s00404–010–1577–z.
  • 3AlptekinH, DalY. Heterotopic pregnancy following IVF-ET: successful treatment with salpingostomy under spinal anesthesia and continuation of intrauterine twin pregnancy[J].Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2014, 289(4):911–914. DOI:10.1007/s00404–013–3099–y.
  • 4朱亮,全松,邢福祺.IVF-ET后发生异位妊娠或宫内外同时妊娠相关因素分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2008,23(16):2260-2262. 被引量:11
  • 5李红真,乔杰,迟洪滨,刘平,吴北生,陈新娜,马彩虹.融胚胎移植与新鲜胚胎移植多胎妊娠率的比较及相关因素分析[J].中华医学杂志,2009,89(37):2626-2628. 被引量:2
  • 6SorianoD, VicusD, SchonmanR, et al. Long-term outcome after laparoscopic treatment of heterotopic pregnancy: 19 cases[J].J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2010, 17(3):321–324. DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2010.01.016.
  • 7胡娅莉.出生缺陷//丰有吉,沈铿.妇产科学.2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2010:65.
  • 8KuczkowskiKM. Laparoscopic procedures during pregnancy and the risks of anesthesia: what does an obstetrician need to know[J].Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2007, 276(3):201–209. DOI:10.1007/s00404–007–0338–0.
  • 9马彩虹,陈贵安,张丽珠,刘平,乔杰.体外受精-胚胎移植后异位妊娠的危险因素、诊断及治疗[J].中国妇产科临床杂志,2003,4(3):192-194. 被引量:7
  • 10李百加,林小娜,匡琳,黄东,金晓莹,张松英.输卵管病变的预处理方式对胚胎移植后妊娠结局的影响[J].中华医学杂志,2014,94(37):2941-2944. 被引量:20

二级参考文献117

共引文献115

同被引文献66

引证文献13

二级引证文献74

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部