期刊文献+

基于WoS核心合集的国际智库研究可视化分析 被引量:10

Visual Analysis of WoS Core Collection-based International Think Tank Studies
原文传递
导出
摘要 运用CiteSpceⅢ软件,对Web of Science核心合集中收录的有关智库研究的论文及其参考文献进行可视化分析,结果表明:核心作者主要来自于美、英等发达国家,其中,斯通、阿贝尔森和麦克甘是最具影响力的学者;里奇、阿贝尔森、史密斯以及斯通等学者的论著成为重要的知识基础;热点领域主要集中于全球治理、科技发展和新自由主义三大版块;气候变化、公共卫生、教育政策以及制度改革等主题是值得重点关注的研究前沿。 This article analyzes the international think tank research situation using analytic method of CiteSpcelU based on the literatures included in the Web of Science core collection, the results show that the core authors are mainly from US and British and other developed countries, the most influential scholars are Stone D., Abelson D. E. and Mcgann J. G.; the important knowledge sources are mainly written by Rich A., Abelson D. E., Smith J. A. and Stone D.; the research hotspots are global governance, scientific & technological development and neoliberalism; the research fronts that need to be specially concerned includes climate change, public health, education policy and insti- tutional reform.
作者 陈琴 蒋合领
出处 《情报资料工作》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第1期68-73,共6页 Information and Documentation Services
关键词 智库 美国 公共政策 决策咨询 知识图谱 think tank, America, public policy, decision consulting, mapping knowledge domain
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Chaomei Chen.CiteSpace II:Detecting and visualizing emerg- ing trends and transient patterns in scientific literature [J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2006, 57(3):359-377.
  • 2Rich Andrew.Think Tanks, Public Policy, and the Politics of Expertise [M].Cambridge, UK; New York:Cambridge Univer- sity Press, 2004.
  • 3Abelson, Donald E.Do Think Tanks Matter? :Assessing the Impact of Public Policy Institutes[M].Montreal:McGill-Queen' s University Press, 2002.
  • 4Pang Zhongying, Hongying Wang.Debating international insti- tutions and global governance:The missing Chinese IPE contri- bution [J]. Review of International Political Economy, 2013, 20(6):1189--1214.
  • 5Joyeeta Gupta, Claudia Pahl-Wostl.Global water governance in the context of global and multilevel governance:Its need, form, and challenges [J]. Ecology and Society, 2013, 18(4):53.
  • 6Warren Pearce, Sujatha Raman.The new Randomised Con- trolled Trials (RCT) movement in public policy:Challenges of epistemic governance [J]. Policy Science, 2014(47):387-402.
  • 7Peter D Blair.Congress' s own think tank:Learning from the legacy of the Office of Technology Assessment (1972-95) [J]. Science and Public Policy, 2014 (41):449-457.
  • 8Johanna K Bockman.The origins of neoliberalism between So- viet socialism and Western capitalism: "A galaxy without bor- ders" [J]. Theory and Society, 2007(36):343-371.
  • 9Joshua M Akers.Making markets:Think tank legislation and private property in Detroit [J]. Urban Geography, 2013, 34(8): 1070-1095.
  • 10Ferenc Jank6, Norbert M6ricz, Judit Papp Vancsr.Reviewing the climate change reviewers:Exploring controversy through re- port references and citations [J]. Geoforum, 2014 (56):17-34.

同被引文献195

引证文献10

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部