期刊文献+

地理距离影响证券分析师预测行为吗? 被引量:21

Can Geographical Distance Affect the Behaviors of Financial Analysts?
下载PDF
导出
摘要 笔者考察了券商机构距离上市公司注册地的远近对证券分析师行为的影响。地理距离的远近决定了分析师获取私有信息的难易程度和成本,从而对他们的行为产生影响。笔者的研究发现:地理距离越远,证券分析师更新盈余预测的频率越低,预测准确度越低;当市场化程度较高时,地理距离对证券分析师的负向影响减弱。这说明,私有信息是影响分析师预测行为的重要信息来源,当距离远时,分析师获取私有信息的难度加大,不利于他们做出有效预测,而市场化程度较高时,公开信息可靠性的增强减弱了地理距离对分析师行为的负面影响。本研究对于我国资本市场参与者、监管层、学术界理解地理位置与证券分析师行为的关系具有重要的参考价值。 This paper studies the effect of distance between headquarter of brokers and listed firms on behaviors of financial analysts. The length of distance determines difficulties and costs that analysts gather private information,so far as affects their behaviors. The empirical evidences show that the farther the geographical distance,the lower frequency the analysts updated their earnings forecasts and the higher forecasts errors. And in higher marketization area,the negative relationship between distance and forecast frequency and forecast accuracy will be weakened. These findings imply that the long distance makes it more difficult for analysts to gain private information,which prevents them from making efficient forecasts. The higher marketization index,however,can increase reliability of public information and relief the negative effects of distance on behaviors of financial analysts. This study can provide important reference for China's market participants,regulators and academics to comprehend the relationship between the geographical distance and the behaviors of financial analysts.
出处 《中央财经大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第1期61-72,共12页 Journal of Central University of Finance & Economics
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目"信息环境变化对海内外分析师行为及其差异影响研究"(项目编号:71102124)
关键词 地理距离 私有信息 分析师预测 市场化程度 Geographical distance Private information Analyst forecasts Marketization index
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1Agarwal S, Hauswald R. Distance and Private Information in Lending [ J ]. Review of Financial Studies, 2010, 23 (7) : 2757 -2788.
  • 2Hauswald R, Marquez R. Competition and Strategic Information Acquisition in Credit Markets [ J]. Review of Financial Studies, 2006, 19 (3) : 967 - 1000.
  • 3Petersen M A, Rajan R G. Does Distance Still Matter? The Information Revolution in Small Business Lending [ J ]. Journal of Finance, 2002, 57 (6) : 2533 -2570.
  • 4Garcla D, Norli 0. Geographic Dispersion and Stock Returns [ J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2012, 106 (3) : 547 -565.
  • 5Kim C F, Pantzalis C, Chul Park J. Political Geography and Stock Returns: The Value and Risk Implications of Proximity to Political Power [ J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2012, 106 (1) : 196-228.
  • 6John K, Knyazeva A, Knyazeva D. Does Geography Matter? Firm Location and Corporate Payout Policy [ J ~. Journal of Financial Economics, 2011, 101 (3) : 533 -551.
  • 7Teo M. The Geography of Hedge Funds [J]. Review of Financial Studies, 2009, 22 (9) : 3531 -3561.
  • 8Defond M L, Francis J R, Hu X. The Geography of SEC Enforcement and Auditor Reporting for Financially Distressed Clients [ R]. working paper, 2011.
  • 9Malloy C J. The Geography of Equity Analysis [J]. Journal of Finance, 2005, 60 (2) : 719 -755.
  • 10Healy P M, Palepu K G. Information Asymmetry, Corporate Disclosure, and the Capital Markets : A Review of the Empirical Disclosure Literature [ J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2001, 31 (1 -3) : 405 -440.

二级参考文献61

共引文献1717

同被引文献320

引证文献21

二级引证文献139

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部