利多卡因与阿替卡因治疗牙体牙髓病的麻醉疗效比较

Articaine and lidocaine in treatment of dental pulp disease curative effect comparison of anesthesia

目的分析比较利多卡因与阿替卡因治疗牙体牙髓病的麻醉疗效。方法选取我院2014年8月~2015年6月收治的牙体牙髓病患者120例,将其随机分为对照组与观察组,各60例。对照组患者予以利多卡因进行局部浸润麻醉,观察组患者予以阿替卡因进行浸润麻醉,对比两组患者的麻醉效果。结果观察组有效57例（95.0%）,对照组有效47例（78.33%）,观察组总有效率以及起效时间均明显优于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论在牙体牙髓病患者的治疗中,利多卡因的浸润麻醉疗效低于阿替卡因,阿替卡因在浸润麻醉时具有较高的临床应用价值,值得临床推广。

Objective To study the analysis of lidocaine and atenolol present because treatment of tooth pulp disease anesthetic effect. Methods Select our hospital 120 cases of patients with tooth pulp disease, were randomly divided into contxol group and observation group, each group of 60 cases each. Of the control group patients give lidocaine anesthesia, observation group of patients who applied for o paid for anesthesia, compare the anesthesia effect of two groups of patients. Results Anesthetic effect effective for 57 cases in observation group （95.0%）, control group patients anesthesia effect is effective for 47 cases （78.33%）, observation group of patients with anesthesia total effective rate and working time were significantly better than the control group patients, with a significant difference between the two groups （P〈0.05）, after statistics analysis, statistically significant. Conclusion In the treatment of tooth pulp disease, lidocaine anesthesia effect is lower than for paid, atenolol paid in anesthesia has high clinical value, worthy of promotion.