期刊文献+

增殖细胞核抗原和上皮膜抗原在胸腺瘤组织的表达及其临床意义 被引量:4

Expression and clinical significance of proliferation cell nuclear antigen and epithelial membrane antigen protein in thymoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的检测增殖细胞核抗原(Ki-67)和上皮膜抗原(EMA)在胸腺瘤组织的表达,探讨其临床意义。方法采用免疫组织化学Envision二步法检测Ki-67和EMA在469例胸腺瘤不同Masaoka临床分期和世界卫生组织(WHO)病理分型中的表达,并对两者进行相关分析。结果Ki-67在Masaoka临床分期和WHO病理分型中,表达程度均逐渐增高,在Ⅰ~Ⅳb期Ki-67指数分别为(1.76±0.30)%、(2.23±0.28)%、(2.26±0.29)%、(7.69±0.63)%、(20.89±3.66)%、(24.89±3.54)%;在A型~B1胸腺癌Ki-67指数分别(1.77±0.31)%、(2.25±0.32)%、(2.55±0.36)%、(6.51±0.53)%、(9.33±0.66)%、(23.81±3.06)%,各组间差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。Ki-67低表达主要在Ⅰ~Ⅱ期和A型-B1型,高表达主要在Ⅲ~Ⅳ期和B2型胸腺癌。EMA在Masaoka临床分期和WHO病理分型中表达程度逐渐降低,在Ⅰ—Ⅳb期积分分别为2.53±0.39、2.49±0.55、2.43±0.55、1.01±0.33、0.96±0.22、0.86±0.22。在A型-B1胸腺癌积分分别为2.55±0.22、2.57±0.19、2.52±0.16、1.12±0.10、1.06±0.12、0.87±0.15,各组间差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。高表达主要在Ⅰ-Ⅱ期和A型~B1型,低表达主要在Ⅲ-Ⅳ期和B2型胸腺癌。Ki-67与EMA在胸腺瘤中表达呈负相关(P〈0.05)。结论Ki-67、EMA与胸腺瘤的发生、发展、侵袭有关,联合检测Ki-67和EMA可能有助于胸腺瘤良恶性的辅助诊断及临床分期和病理分型。 Objective To investigate the expression and clinical significance of proliferation cell nuclear antigen ( Ki - 67 ) and epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) protein in thymoma. Methods The expression of EMA and Ki -67 monoclonal antibody was detected by immunohistochemical Envision in different Masaoka stages and WHO type of 469 cases of thymoma, and the correlation between EMA and Ki - 67 was analyzed. Results In Masaoka stage and WHO type, the Ki - 67 expression level increased gradually. In stage Ⅰ - Ⅳb, the Ki - 67 index was ( 1.76 ±0. 30 ) %, ( 2.23 ±0. 28 ) %, (2. 26 ±0.29)%, (7.69 ±0.63)%, (20.89±3.66)% and (24.89 ±3.54)%, respectively. In type A-thymic carcinoma, the Ki -67 index was (1.77 ±0. 31)%, (2. 25 ±0. 32)%, (2. 55 ±0. 36)%, (6. 51 ± 0. 53)%, (9. 33 ±0. 66)%, and (23.81 s3.06)%, respectively (P〈0. 05). The lower expression of Ki - 67 was mainly in stage Ⅰ - Ⅱ and type A - B1 thymoma, and the high expression of Ki - 67 was atmost in stage Ⅲ- Ⅳ and type B2 - thymic carcinoma. In Masaoka stage and WHO type, EMA expression level was reduced gradually. In stage Ⅰ - Ⅳb, score was 2. 53 ±0.39, 2.49 ±0.55,2.43 ±0. 55, 1.01 ± 0. 33, 0. 96 ± 0. 22 and 0. 86 ± 0. 22, respectively. In type A - thymic carcinoma, score was 2. 55 ±0.22, 2. 57±0.19, 2. 52 ±0.16, 1.12 ±0.10, 1.06 ±0.12, and 0.87 ±0.15, respectively (P〈 0. 05). The high expression of EMA was mainly in stage Ⅰ - Ⅱ and type A - B1 thymoma. Nevertheless, the lower expression of EMA was almost in stage Ⅲ- Ⅳ and type B2 - thymic carcinoma. The Ki - 67 expression was negatively correlated with EMA expression in thymoma ( P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion Ki - 67 and EMA have an intimate association with occurrence, development and invasiveness of thymoma. The detection of Ki - 67 combine with EMA had a better contribution to benign and malignant diagnosis as well as Masaoka stage and WHO type.
出处 《中华实验外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第1期238-241,共4页 Chinese Journal of Experimental Surgery
基金 辽宁省博士启动、自然科学基金(20042088)
关键词 胸腺瘤 增殖细胞核抗原 上皮膜抗原 Thymoma Proliferation cell nuclear antigen Epithelial membrane antigen
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Ninnala S, Janaki MG, Malavika K, et al. Invasive thymoma with in- traorbital metastases[ J]. J Cancer Res Ther,2009,5 ( 1 ) :41-42. DOI : 10. 4103/0973-1482. 48768.
  • 2Li LT,jiang G, Chen Q, et al. Ki-67 is a promising mdecular target in the diagnosis of cancer (Review) [J]. Mol Med Rep,2015,11(3) : 1566-1572.
  • 3Kansch I, Lingnau A, Endl E, et al. Antisense treatment against Ki-67 mRNA inhibits proliferation and tumor growth in vitro and in vivo[ J]. Int J Cancer,2003,105(5) :710-716. DOI:10. 1002/ijc. 11111.
  • 4Geyer FC, Rodrigues DN, Weigelt B, et al. Molecular classification of estrogen receptor-positive/luminal breast cancers [ J ]. Adv Anat Pathol,2012,19( I ) :39-53. DOI : 10. 1097/PAP. 0b013e31823fafa0.
  • 5Hu HY, Liu H,Zbang JW, et al. Clinical significance of Smac and Ki-67 expression in pancreatic cancer [ J]. Hepatogastroenterology, 2012,59 ( 120 ) : 2640-2643. DOI: 10.5754/hge12071.
  • 6Park JY, Kim KR, Nam JH. Immunohistochemical analysis for thera- peutic targets and prognostic markers in low grade endometrial stromal sarcoma[ J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer,2013,23 (1) :81-89. DOI:10. 1097/IGC. 0b013e3182738361.
  • 7Nagao K,Yamamoto Y,Hara T,et al. Ki-67 and BUBR1 may discriminate clinically insignificant prostate cancer in the PSA range < 4 ng/ml [J]. Jpn J Clin Oncol,2011,41 (4) :555-564. DOI: I0. 1093/iieo/hvc1233.
  • 8臧益秀,孙善平,王晓,陈连胜,田斌,李均.乳腺癌患者外周血EMA和EGP-2mRNA的表达及其临床意义[J].中国普通外科杂志,2008,17(5):449-453. 被引量:5
  • 9窦中岭,周四维,陈书昌.Ki-67、Bcl-2和EMA的表达及其与膀胱肿瘤生物学行为的关系[J].中华实验外科杂志,1999,16(1):14-15. 被引量:1
  • 10杨竹林,钟德午,李永国,黄生福,庄赞根.胆管癌组织中EMA、CK的表达及其意义[J].临床肝胆病杂志,1996,12(1):22-24. 被引量:5

二级参考文献10

  • 1Yang E, Hu XF, Advances of MUC1 as a target for breast cancer immunotherapy [ J ] . Histol Histopathol, 2007 , 22 (8):905-922.
  • 2Musselli C, Ragupathi G, Gilewski T, et al. Reevaluation of the cellular immune response in breast cancer patients vaccinated with MUC1 [J]. Int J Cancer, 2002,97(5):660-667.
  • 3de Roos MA, van deer Vegt B, Peterse JL, et al. The expression pattern of MUC 1 ( EMA ) is related to tumor characteristics and clinical outcome of invasive ductal breast carcinoma [J]. Histopathology, 2007, 5151 (2):227-238.
  • 4Went PT, Lugli A, Meier S, et al. Frequent EPCAM protein expression in human carcinomas [J]. Hum Pathol, 2004, 35(1):122-128.
  • 5Rao CG, Chianese D, Doyle GV, et al. Expression of epithelial cell adhesion molecule in carcinoma cells present in blood and primary and metastatic tumors [ J ]. Int J Oncol, 2005 , 27(1):49-57.
  • 6Osta WA, Chen Y. EpCAM is overexpressed in breast cancer and is a potential target for breast cancer gene therapy [ J ]. Cancer Res,2004,64( 16 ) :5818 - 5824.
  • 7De Graaf, H, Melandsmo GM, Ruud P, et al. Ectopic expression of target genes may represent an inherent limitation of reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assays used for micrometastases detecton: Studies on the epithelial glycoprotein gene EGP-2[J]. Int J Cancer, 1997, 72(1):191 -196.
  • 8Gommans WM, McLaughlin PM. Engineering zinc finger protein transcription factors to downregulate the epithelial glycoprotein-2 promoter as a novel anti-cancer treatment [ J ]. Mol Carcinog, 2007, 46(5) :391 -401.
  • 9McLaughhn PM, Harmsen MC. The epithelial glycoprotein z (EGP-2) promoter-driven epithelial-specific expression of EGP-2 in transgenic mice: a new model to study carcinoma- directed immunotherapy [ J ]. Cancer Res, 2001, 61 (10) :4105 -4111
  • 10Huang PL, Wang J, Guo Y, et al. Molecular detection of disseminated tumor cells in the peripheral blood in patients with gastrointestinal cancer [ J ]. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 2003, 129(3) :192- 198.

共引文献7

同被引文献18

引证文献4

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部