3Neitsch S L, Arnold J G, Kiniry J R, et al. Soil and water assess- ment tool theoretical documentation [A]. Texas Water Resources In- stitute Technical Report 406 [C]. Texas A&M University, 2011.
4Moriasi D N, Arnold J G, ~qan Liew M W, et al. Model evaluation gnidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations [J]. Transactions of the ASABE, 2007,50(3):885-900.
5Abbaspour K C. SWAT-CUP4: SWAT Calibration and Uncertainty Programs-A User Manual. Eawag Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology [Z]. 2011.
6Nossent J, Bauwens W. Multi-variable sensitivity and identifiability analysis for a complex environmental model in view of integrated water quantity and water quality modeling [J]. Water Science and Technology, 2012,65(3):539-549.
7Lenhart T, Eckhardt K, Fohrer N, et al. Comparison of two dif- ferent approaches of sensitivity analysis [J]. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 2002,27(9): 645-654.
8Krause P, Boyle D P, Base F. Comparison of different efficiency criteria for hydrological model assessment [J]. Advances in Geo- sciences, 2005,5(5):89-97.
9Yang J, Reichert P, Abbaspour K C, et al. Comparing uncertainty analysis techniques for a SWAT application to the Chaohe basin in China[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2008,358(1):1-23.
