2Zimhelman M. F. 1997. The effects of SAS No. 82 on auditor' s attention to fraud risk factors and audit planning decisions. Journal of Accounting Research (Supplement) : 75 ~ 97.
3AICPA 1972. SAS No. 1, Jan. 1977. SAS No. 16, April 1988. SAS No. 53, Feb. 1997. SAS No. 82, Oct. 2002. SAS No. 99.
4Carol A Knapp. Michael C Knapp. 2001. The effects of experience and explicit fraud risk assessment in detecting fraud analytical proeedures. Accounting, Organization and Society 26:25-37.
5Roland L Madison. Feb. 1999. SAS No. 82: Sword or shield? The National Public Accountants. Volume 44:20 ~ 22.
6Kurt J Pany. 0 Ray Whittington. Dec. 2001. Research Implication of the Auditing Standard Board' s Current Agenda. Volume 15:401 ~ 411.
7POB, Panel on Audit Effectiveness. 2000. Report and Recommendations. Stamford. CT: POB.
8Bell T and J Carcello A decision aid for assessing the likelihood of fraudulent financial reporting, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Spring, 2000.
9Bishop,T J F Auditing for Fraud: Implications of Current Market Trends and Potential Responses. The Auditor's Report, Winter, 2001.
