摘要
采用文献资料、信息技术、数理统计、比较分析等方法,对李雪芮和王仪涵参加2014年仁川亚运会比赛的发球与接发球技术和战术进行统计与分析,为我国优秀羽毛球女单选手在以后的比赛中的战技术运用中提供一些参考。研究结果发现:1)发球的战术上,李雪芮和王仪涵两位优秀选手的发球质量都相当高,发球落点的选择在1、2、3号区域的网前小球比重最大,其次是8、9号区域后场平高球,最后是7号区域的平射球。2)发球的技术上,李雪芮主要采取发网前球为主结合高远球为辅,达到打乱对手节奏的效果。而王仪涵主要以网前球为主,能有效的判断对方的来求路线,为下一拍的回球做好充分的准备。3)接发球的战术上,李雪芮和王仪涵在接发球的区域落点上都有一定的规律性和倾向性,主要都是以前场的短球结合后场的高球为主。李雪芮的接发球搓球和挑球占了很重要的一部分,相对于李雪芮来说,王仪涵一方面用搓放球来组织进攻,另一方面则用吊球来压制对方前场,主动进攻。4)接发球的技术上,李雪芮和王仪涵两位选手在接发球的变化上具有比较大的差异。李雪芮主要集中在正手的搓放和反手的挑球,而王仪涵主要集中在正手吊球和挑球以及反手的推球。
The methods of literature material, infonnation technology, mathematical statistics and comparative analsis are employed to analyze the serve and receive technical and tactical statistics of 1,1 Xue - rui and WANG Yi - han in the 2014 Inchon Asian Games. The results showed that 1 ) as for the serve tactics, the service quality of both is quite high, most serve placement are net ball in the No. 1, 2 and 3 region, followed by clear in No. 8 and 9 region, and last is light ball in No. 7 area. 2) Concerning service technologT, LI mainly adopted a position with the lofty ball as a supplement to disrupt the opponent's rhythm effect. WANG mainly served net ball to effectively judge each other and seek a route for the next shot, ready for the back ball. 3) With reterence to return of serve tactics, both L1 and WANG have certain regularity and preference of regional placement in return, mainly dominated by the front short with backcourt lob. Rub the ball sela'ing and pick the ball accounted for a yew important part of LI, and compared with LI, WANG on the one hand rub on the ball to attack the organization, and on the other hand, shot to suppress the other end and take the initiative to attack. 4) For receiving technology, LI and WAN(; have relatively large differences in the change of receiving. I,I focused on the forehand and backhand twist on the ball, while WANG focused on the forehand shot and pick the ball and the ball backhand.
出处
《山东体育科技》
2015年第6期52-56,共5页
Shandong Sports Science & Technology
关键词
羽毛球
女子单打
发球
接发球
对比分析
badminton
women's singles
serve
receive
comparative analysis