期刊文献+

基于CA的有毒气体泄漏事故风险动态评估 被引量:3

CA-based dynamic risk assessment of toxic gas leakage accidents
原文传递
导出
摘要 针对有毒气体泄漏事故风险动态评估问题,基于元胞自动机(cellular automata,CA)理论,首先构建了有毒气体浓度动态预测模型,然后以动态预测模型为基础,进一步构建了有毒气体泄漏事故个人风险和社会风险动态评估模型,最后通过对氯气泄漏事故的仿真模拟验证了该模型的有效性.研究结果表明:该模型能够同时对有毒气体泄漏事故的影响范围以及影响范围内各个位置处的有毒气体浓度,个人风险,社会风险进行快速地实时地评估.通过模型计算得到的有毒气体泄漏事故个人风险和社会风险的动态评估结果可为应急疏散的开展以及应急救援资源的合理分配提供科学有效的依据. To the issue of dynamic risk assessment of toxic gas leakage accidents, based on the cellular automata (CA) theory, dynamic prediction model of toxic gas concentration is formulated at first, and then dynamic individual risk and social risk assessment model of toxic gas leakage accidents is further constructed based on the dynamic prediction model. At last, the proposed model is verified through the simulation of one chlorine gas leakage accident. The results show that the proposed model can simultaneously predict the impact scope of the toxic gas leakage accidents and evaluate the toxic gas concentration, the individual risk the social risk at any location in the impact scope in real time efficiently, and the dynamic individual risk and social risk assessment outcomes of the toxic gas leakage accidents, which can be obtained through the proposed model in this paper, can provide scientific and effective supports for the emergency evacuation and reasonable emergency resource allocation.
出处 《系统工程理论与实践》 EI CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2016年第1期253-262,共10页 Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice
基金 国家科技支撑计划项目(2013BAH11F00) 国家自然科学基金(71431004 71171082 71302043)~~
关键词 危险化学品 有毒气体泄漏 风险动态评估 元胞自动机(CA) 应急响应 hazardous chemicals toxic gas leakage dynamic risk assessment cellular automata (CA) emergency response
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Duan W, Chen G, Ye Q, et al. The situation of hazardous chemical accidents in China between 2000 and 2006[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2011, 186(2): 1489-1494.
  • 2李健,白晓昀,任正中,吴军.2011~2013年我国危险化学品事故统计分析及对策研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(6):142-147. 被引量:97
  • 3Li J, Zhang B, Liu W, et al. Research on OREMS-based large-scale emergency evacuation using vehicles[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2011, 89(5): 300-309.
  • 4Sklavounos S, Rigas F. Advanced multi-perspective computer simulation as a tool for reliable consequence anal- ysis[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2012, 90(2): 129-140.
  • 5Hanna S R, Hansen O R, Ichard M, et al. CFD model simulation of dispersion from chlorine railcar releases in industrial and urban areas[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2009, 43(2): 262-270.
  • 6Khan F I, Abbasi S A. Analytical simulation and PROFAT II: A new methodology and a computer automated tool for fault tree analysis in chemical process industries[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2000, 75(1): 1-27.
  • 7Khan F I, Abbasi S A. A criterion for developing credible accident scenarios for risk assessment[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2002, 15(6): 467-475.
  • 8孙燕君,钱瑜,张玉超.蒙特卡洛分析在氯气泄漏事故环境风险评价中的应用研究[J].环境科学学报,2011,31(11):2570-2577. 被引量:14
  • 9Zhang B, Chen G. Quantitative risk analysis of toxic gas release caused poisoning -- A CFD and dose-response model combined approach[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2010, 88(4): 253-262.
  • 10Galeev A D, Salin A A, Ponikarov S I. Consequence analysis of aqueous ammonia spill using computational fluid dynamics[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2013, 26(4): 628-638.

二级参考文献74

共引文献163

同被引文献21

引证文献3

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部