罗哌卡因联合地塞米松局部浸润改善骨与关节手术后镇痛效果被引量：1

The analgesic effect of intraoperative wound infiltration with ropivacaine and dexamethasone after bone and joint surgery

下载PDF

导出

摘要目的探讨罗哌卡因联合地塞米松手术区域局部浸润镇痛能否改善骨与关节手术后疼痛及减少术后口服镇痛药量。方法将2014年6月至8月我院51例需行骨关节手术患者随机分成两组,实验组术中局部浸润0.1%罗哌卡因20 m L(200 mg)联合地塞米松2 mg,对照组术中局部浸润等量生理盐水。记录患者术后4、8、12、24、48 h疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS),给予自觉疼痛难忍者口服镇痛药。主要评价指标为术后VAS评分;次要评价指标为口服镇痛药物剂量及首次口服镇痛药物距手术结束时间、术后不良反应、总体满意度等。结果实验组与对照组术后8、12、24、48 h VAS评分有统计学差异,两组口服奇曼丁总剂量、总体满意度有统计学差异。结论罗哌卡因联合地塞米松手术区域局部浸润可显著降低骨与关节手术后静息疼痛,减少需使用镇痛药物的人数,延迟术后镇痛药物应用时间,减少镇药物使用剂量。 Objective To evaluate the analgesic effect of intraoperative wound infiltration with ropivacaine and dexamethasone after bone and joint surgery. Methods From June to August 2014, 51 patients were randomized into two groups. At the end of suegery, 20 mL 0. 1% ropivacaine （200 mg） and dexamethasone （2 rag） or saline was respectively infiltrated in two groups. The visual analog scales （VAS） scores at 4,8,12,24 and 48 h after surgery were recorded, and the patients were administered with analgesics if the patients thought the pain had a negative effect on rest. The primary endpoints were the VAS scores at 4, 8, 12,24 and 48 h. The secondary endpoints were total dose of analgesics, time of analgesics consumption, side-effects and gross satisfaction scales. Results The VAS scores at 8, 12,24 and 48 h after surgery while resting, total dose of analgesics, time of analgesics consumption, side-effects and gross satisfaction scales were statistically different between two groups. Conclusion Ropivacaine and dexamethasone wound infiltration could reduce postoperative pain and analgesics requirements during the first 48 hours after surgery.

作者张超谢宗平金东旭张长青

机构地区上海交通大学附属第六人民医院骨科

出处《国际骨科学杂志》 2016年第1期53-56,共4页 International Journal of Orthopaedics

关键词骨与关节手术麻醉镇痛局部浸润 Bone and joint surgery Anesthesia Analgesia Local infiltration

分类号 R614 [医药卫生—麻醉学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献24

1Astur DC. Aleluia V. Veronese C. et al. A prospective double blinded randomized study of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstrings tendon and spinal anesthesia with or without femoral nerve block[J]. Knee. 2014. 21(5): 911-915.
2Moen V. Dahlgren N. lrestedt L. Severe neurological complications after central neuraxial blockades in Sweden 1990-1999[J]. Anesthesiology. 2004. 10l( 4) : 950-959.
3Fournier R. van Gessel E. Gaggero G. et al. Postoperative analgesia with 3-in-l "femoral nerve block after prosthetic hip surgery[J]. CanJ Anaesth , 1998. 45 (1) : 34-38.
4MarinoJ. RussoJ. Kenny M. et al. Continuous lumbar plexus block for postoperative pain control after total hip arthroplasty. A randomized controlled trial[J].J BoneJoint Surg Am. 2009. 91(1):29-37.
5Bianconi M. Ferraro L. Traina GC. et al. Pharmacokinetics and efficacy of ropivacaine continuous wound instillation afterJoint replacement surgery[J]. BrJ Anaesth , 2003. 91 (6): 830-835.
6Andersen LO. Otte KS. Husted H. et al. High-volume infiltration analgesia in bilateral hip arthroplasty. A randomized. double-blind placebo-controlled trial[J]. Acta Orthop , 2011. 82(4) :423-426.
7Bech RD. Ovesen O. Lindholm r. et al. Local anesthetic wound infiltration for pain management after periacetabular osteotomy. A randomized. placebo-controlled. double-blind clinical trial with 53 patients[J]. Acta Orthop , 2014. 85(2): 141-146.
8Kerr DR. Kohan L. Local infiltration analgesia: a technique for the control of acute postoperative pain following knee and hip surgery. A case study of 325 patients[J]. Acta Orthop , 2008. 79(2): 174-183.
9Andersen LJ. Poulsen T. Krogh B. et al. Postoperative analgesia in total hip arthroplasty: a randomized double -blinded , placebo-controlled study on peroperative and postoperative ropivacaine , ketorolac , and adrenaline wound infiltration[J]. Acta Orthop , 2007. 78(2): 187-192.
10Lunn TH. Husted H. Solgaard S. et al. Intraoperative local infiltration analgesia for early analgesia after total hip arthroplasty: a randomized. double-blind. placebo-controlled trial[J]. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011. 36(5) :424-429.