经鼻同步间歇指令通气在重度呼吸窘迫综合征早产儿撤机后的应用被引量：23

Apllication of nasal synchronous intermittent mandatory ventilation in premature infants with severe respiratory distress syndrome after extubation

原文传递

导出

摘要目的探讨重度呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)早产儿撤机后行经鼻同步间歇指令通气(nSIMV)的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析2013年1月至2015年5月新生儿重症监护病房住院的126例RDS早产儿的临床资料。2013年1月至2014年3月住院患儿采用经鼻持续气道正压通气(nCPAP)(61例),而2014年4月至2015年5月住院患儿采用nSIMV(65例)。比较两组治疗后血气分析指标、撤机失败率与原因及并发症的差异。结果通气治疗4h后,nSIMV组pH值、氧分压(PaO_2)、血氧饱和度(SaO_2)和氧合指数(OI)均高于nCPAP组(均P<0.05);nSIMV组二氧化碳分压(PaCO_2)低于nCPAP组(P<0.05)。nSIMV组和nCPAP组撤机失败率分别是9%(6/65)和30%(18/61)(P<0.05),其撤机失败的原因主要有低氧血症(2%vs 5%,P>0.05)、高碳酸血症(6%vs 11%,P>0.05)和呼吸暂停(2%vs 13%,P<0.05)。两组患儿在呼吸机支持时间、全肠道喂养时间、恢复出生体重时间和总住院时间上比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗后nSIMV组腹胀发生率明显低于nCPAP组(9%vs 30%,P<0.05),但两组喂养不耐受、坏死性小肠结肠炎、脑室内出血、早产儿视网膜病变和支气管肺发育不良的发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论重度RDS早产儿撤机后采用nSIMV不仅明显改善肺通气功能,降低撤机失败率,且治疗后胃肠道副反应小,不增加并发症的发生,在临床值得推广。 Objective To study the clinical efficacy of nasal synchronous intermittent mandatory ventilation（nSIMV） in premature infants with severe respiratory distress syndrome（RDS） after extubation.Methods A retrospective analysis on the clinical date of 126 premature infants with severe RDS who were hospitalized in the NICU between January 2013 and May 2015 was performed.Sixty-one premature infants who were hospitalized in the NICU between January 2013 and March 2014 received nasal continuous positive airway pressure（nCPAP）（nCPAP group） and65 premature infants who were hospitalized in the NICU between April 2014 and May 2015 received nSIMV（nSIMV group）.The blood gas analysis indexes,the rate of extubation failure,the causes of extubation failure and the incidence of complications were compared between the two groups.Results After 4 hours of treatment,the pH value,PaO_2,SaO_2and oxygenation index in the nSIMV group were significantly higher than in the nCPAP group（P0.05）,meanwhile,the PaCO_2 in the nSIMV group were significantly lower than in the nCPAP group（P0.05）.The rates of extubation failure in the nSIMV and nCPAP groups were 9%（6/65） and 30%（18/61） respectively（P0.05）.The extubation failure in the nSIMV and nCPAP groups was caused by hyoxemia（2%vs 5%;P0.05）,hypercapnia（6%vs 11%;P0.05） and apnea（2%vs 13%;P0.05）.There were no differences in respirator support time,full enteral feeding time,the time to regain birth weight and the length of hospitalization between two groups（P0.05）.After treatment,the incidence of abdominal distension in the nSIMV group was significantly lower than in the nCPAP group（9%vs 30%;P0.05） and there were no differences in the incidences of feeding intolerance,necrotizing enterocolitis,intraventricular hemorrhage,retinopathy of prematurity and bronchopulmonory dysplasia between the two groups.Conclusions nSIMV for premature infants with severe RDS after extubation not only significantly improves lung function and reduces the rate of extubation failure,also results in a lower incidence of gastrointestinal side effects and does not increase the incidence of complications.

作者陶海峰陶敏蔡娜廖伟

机构地区第三军医大学西南医院儿科

出处《中国当代儿科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第1期1-5,共5页 Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics

关键词呼吸窘迫综合征经鼻同步间歇指令通气经鼻持续气道正压通气早产儿 Respiratory distress syndrome Nasal synchronous intermittent mandatory ventilation Nasal continuous positive airway pressure Premature infant

分类号 R722.6 [医药卫生—儿科]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献15

1Zhou B,Zhai JF,Jiang HX,et al.Usefulness of DuoPAP in the treatment of very low birth weight preterm infants with neonatal respiratory distress syndrome[J].Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci,2015,19(4):573-577.
2Howlett A,Ohlsson A,Plakkal N.Inositol in preterm infants at risk for or having respiratory distress syndrome[J].Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2015,2:D366.
3Armanian AM,Badiee Z,Heidari G,et al.Initial treatment of respiratory distress syndrome with nasal intermittent mandatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure:a randomized controlled trial[J].Int J Prev Med,2014,5(12):1543-1551.
4Rebello CM,Precioso AR,Mascaretti RS;Grupo Colaborativo do Estudo Brasileiro Multicêntrico de Surfactante.A multicenter,randomized,double-blind trial of a new porcine surfactant in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome[J].Einstein (Sao Paulo),2014,12(4):397-404.
5Chang HY,Claure N,D'ugard C,et al.Effects of synchronization during nasal ventilation in clinically stable preterm infants[J].Pediatr Res,2011,69(1):84-89.
6王灿,陈龙,汪丽,王楠,吴婷婷,史源.经鼻间歇正压通气用于拔管后呼吸支持的临床研究[J].重庆医学,2013,42(36):4408-4409. 被引量：4
7Wang C,Guo L,Chi C,et al.Mechanical ventilation modes for respiratory distress syndrome in infants:a systematic review and network meta-analysis[J].Crit Care,2015,19:108.
8Yilmaz O,Kahveci H,Zeybek C,et al.Inhaled iloprost in preterm infants with severe respiratory distress syndrome and pulmonary hypertension[J].Am J Perinatol,2014,31(4):321-326.
9Nayeri FS,Esmaeilnia ST,Aminnezhad M,et al.Comparison of INSURE method with conventional mechanical ventilation after surfactant administration in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome:therapeutic challenge[J].Acta Med Iran,2014,52(8):596-600.
10Paul S,Rao S,Kohan R,et al.Poractant alfa versus beractant for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants:a retrospective cohort study[J].J Paediatr Child Health,2013,49(10):839-844.

二级参考文献30

1解立新,刘又宁.回复孙凤春医师关于BiPAP和BIPAP的概念问题[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2005,28(3):208-208. 被引量：16
2Bancalari E, Claure N. Non-invasive ventilation of the pre term infant[J]. Early Hum Dev, 2008,84 (12) : 815-819.
3Davis PG, Morley CJ, ()wen LS. Non invasive respiratory support of preterm neonates with respiratory distress: continuous positive airway pressure and nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation [J] Semin Fetal Neonatal Med,2009,14(1) :14 20.
4Louise SO,Colin JM, Peter GD. Neonatal nasal intermit- tent positive pressure ventilation: what do we know in 20077 [J] Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2007,92 (5) :414-418.
5Friedlich P,Lecart C,Posen R,et al. A randomized trial of nasopharyngeal-synchronized intermittent mandatory ven- tilation versus nasopharyngeal continuous positive airway pressure in very low birth weight infants after extubation [J]. J Perinatol,1999,19(6 Pt 1) :413 418.
6Kugelman A, Fererkorn I, Riskin A, et al. Nasal intermit- tent mandatory ventilation versus nasal continuous posi- tive airway pressure for respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized, controlled, prospective study[J]. J Pediatr, 2007,150(2) : 521-526.
7Barrington KJ,Bull D, Finer NN. Randomized trial of na- sal synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation eom pared with continuous positive airway pressure after extu- bation of verylow birth weight infants [J]. Pediatrics, 2001,107(4) :638-641.
8Khalaf MN, Brodsky N, Hurley J, et al. A prospective randomized, controlled trial comparing synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure as modes of extuba- tion[J] Pediatrics, 2001,108 ( 1 ) ~ 13-17.
9Khorana M, Paradeevisut H, Sangtawesin V, et al. A ran- domized trial of non-synchronized nasopharyngeal inter- mittent mandatory ventilation (nsNIMV)vs. nasal con- tinuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in the preven- tion of extubation failure in pre-term~l 500 grams[J]. J Med Assoc Thai,2008,91 Suppl 3,136-142.
10Moretti C,Giannini L,Fassi C,et al. Nasal flow-synchronized intermittent positive pressure ventilation to facilitate weaning in very low-birthweight infants:unmasked randomized controlled trial[J] Pediatr Int,2008,50(1) ..85-91.