期刊文献+

基于FAHP与可变模糊集的矿山生态安全效应评估 被引量:6

Ecological Security Effect Evaluation of Mine Based on Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process and Variable Fuzzy Sets
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了定量评估金属矿山生态安全现状,建立了金属矿山生态安全效应评估指标体系及评估等级标准,采用模糊层次法(FAHP)确定生态安全效应各子系统及其指标的权重,并引入可变模糊集理论,建立基于FAHP与可变模糊集的矿山生态安全效应评估耦合模型.利用该模型对安徽某大型铜矿的生态安全效应进行评估,经计算该矿在生产效应、自然禀赋效应和社会经济效应子系统上属于Ⅱ级,在环境效应子系统上属于Ⅲ级,矿山综合生态安全效应状态属于Ⅱ级.结果表明:该模型计算简便、可信度高,与其他评估方法得到的结果相一致,亦符合矿山实际情况. In order to quantitatively evaluate ecological security current status in metal mines, the evaluation index system and evaluation grading criterions of ecological security effect in metal mines were created. Weights of evaluation subsystem and secondary indexes were obtained by the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP). An evaluation integrated model was built for ecological security effect in metal mines on the basis of FAHP and variable fuzzy sets. The model was applied to evaluate ecological security effect for a large copper mine in Anhui province. Through the calculation of the model, the ecological security effect grade of production effect, natural endowment effect and socioeconomic effect was classified as class Ⅱ ; the environmental effect subsystem was classified as class Ⅱ. The overall evaluation of the copper mine was classified as class Ⅱ. The results show that the model is reliable and flexible and its results are consistent with the actual situations and those of other models.
出处 《东北大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第1期94-99,共6页 Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science)
基金 国家科技支撑计划项目(2013BAB02B05)
关键词 模糊层次分析法(FAHP) 可变模糊集 矿山生态安全效应 评估指标体系 相对差异函数 fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP) variable fuzzy sets ecological securityeffect of mines evaluation index system relative difference function
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Wang Z D. Application of green bio-mining technology forcoal under villages in environmental protection [ J]. Journalof Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 2014, 6(6):2120-2124.
  • 2Favas P J C,Pratas J,Gomes M E P,et al. Selective chemicalextraction of heavy metals in tailings and soils contaminatedby mining activity :environmental implications[ J]. Journal ofGeochemical Exploration ,2011,111(3):160 -171.
  • 3齐朔风.矿山生态安全的BP神经网络评价方法与应用研究[D].太原:太原理工大学,2010.
  • 4曾晟,杜雪明,谭凯旋.基于广义线性理论的铀矿生态环境安全评价[J].矿冶工程,2014,34(2):27-30. 被引量:1
  • 5Chen S Y,Guo Y. Variable fuzzy sets and its application incomprehensive risk evaluation for flood-control engineeringsystem[J]. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making,2006(2) :153 -162.
  • 6ZHANG Dan,WANG Guoli,ZHOU Huicheng.Assessment on Agricultural Drought Risk Based on Variable Fuzzy Sets Model[J].Chinese Geographical Science,2011,21(2):167-175. 被引量:33
  • 7Zhang X L,Wang L H. Choosing an appropriate constructionproject delivery method using FAHP in China [ C ] // 2009IEEE the 16th International Conference on IndustrialEngineering and Engineering Management. Beijing,2009 :78 -82.
  • 8徐泽水.模糊互补判断矩阵的相容性及一致性研究[J].解放军理工大学学报(自然科学版),2002,3(2):94-96. 被引量:109
  • 9Frouz J, Kalcfk J, Velichovd V. Factors causing spatialheterogeneity in soil properties,plant cover,and soil fauna ina non-reclaimed post-mining site [ J ]. EcologicalEngineering,2011 :191 -1911.
  • 10Benzaazoua M,Bussi6re B, Demers I, et al. Integrated minetailings management by combining environmentaldesulphurization and cemented paste backfill: application tomine Doyon,Quebec,Canada [ J ]. Minerals Engineering,2008,21 (4) :330 -340.

二级参考文献45

共引文献161

同被引文献107

引证文献6

二级引证文献60

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部