期刊文献+

室内设计作品之评量与偏好研究——以饭店大厅为例

Evaluation and Preference about Interior Design Works:Using Hotel Lobby as an Example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 室内设计作品到底需具什么样的创意与美感的属性或特征才会受到喜爱?不同属性的个人之间又有何不同?以一个实证性研究,采用"相关性研究法"来探讨这方面的问题,主要目的在于探讨创意评量、美感判断与视觉偏好这3个变项之间的关系。以饭店大厅之室内设计实景彩色照片为问卷调查工具,经以计算机统计软件SPSS对416份有效问卷数据进行分析后发现:1)不同属性之受测者,对美感、创意与偏好构成因素之看法有显著差异,其中以专业背景变项所导致的差异相对较多;2)美感、创意与偏好3变项彼此间全部均达显著相关;3)以美感与创意的相关程度最高;4)有7个变项可联合解释偏好52.1%的变异量,影响"偏好"以创意变项为主。 What creative and aesthetic attributes or features interior design works needed to be viewed as preferable by people? How different the evaluation and preference are among individuals of different personal attributes? This is an empirical study applying the correlational research method to explore these issues. The main purpose of this study is to explore the relationships among variables of creativity evaluation,aesthetic judgment and visual preference. Color pictures of designed hotel lobbies were used as the measuring instrument. The collected data of 416 samples were analyzed with SPSS software. The results include: 1) Subjects of different personal attributes differ significantly in some factors of creativity evaluation,aesthetic judgment and visual preference; 2) The variables of aesthetic,creativity and preference are significantly related to each other; 3) The highest coefficient among three variables about lobby is aesthetic and creativity; 4) Multiple regression analysis about lobby reveals 7 predictive variables accounting for 52. 1% of total explained variance,and the main variable is from creativity. This study proposes suggestions for design practices and future researches for interior design on the base of its findings.
作者 刘懿瑾
出处 《北京联合大学学报》 CAS 2016年第1期62-67,共6页 Journal of Beijing Union University
关键词 创意评量 美感判断 视觉偏好 室内设计 Creativity evaluation Aesthetic judgment Visual preference Interior design
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1毛连媪,郭有通,陈龙安,等.创造力研究[M].台北市:心理出版社,2000.
  • 2张世彗.创造力:理论、技术/技法与培育[M].台北市:五南出版社,2004.
  • 3Lang J. Creating Architectural Theory: The Role of the Behavioral Sciences in Environmental Design[ M ]. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1987.
  • 4Devlin K, Nasar J. The beauty and the best: Some preliminary comparisons of "high" versus "popular" residential architecture and public versus architect judgments of same[ J ]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 1989 (9) : 333 -344.
  • 5Groat L N, Despr6s C. The significance of architectural theory for environmental design research// Zube E H, Moore G T. Advances in Environment, Behavior and Design[ C ]. New York: Plenum, 1991:3 -53.
  • 6Nasar J L. Symbolic meanings of house styles[ J . Environment and Behavior, 1989 (21) : 235 - 257.
  • 7彭台光,高月慈,林钲芩.管理研究中的共同方法变异:问题本质、影响、测试和补救[J].管理学报,2006,23(1):77-98.

共引文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部