期刊文献+

核电厂数字化主控室班组布局协作行为方式可靠度模拟研究 被引量:1

The Reliability Simulative Study of Collaboration Behaviour Way for Team iayouts in Digital Main Control Room of Nuclear Power Plant
下载PDF
导出
摘要 核电厂主控室运行过程一般由4-10人共同完成,显然,团队成员必须紧密合作才能完成任务,该研究就是用来测试班组布局协作方式的效果。文章描述了班组布局四种协作行为方式,每种类别的协作行为方式分为两种情况。实验过程设计了特定的语境、影响因子及蒸汽传热管断裂事故一回路的协作点,通过模拟实验获得了每种协作方式的协作时间和失误率,更好的协作方式及每种协作方式的性能。 A running process in main control room of Nuclear Power Plant( NPP) is executed together by four to ten operators.Obviously,the team members must closely cooperate to finish tasks. This study tested the effect of different collaboration types of team layout. This paper described four collaboration behavior ways of team layout that each collaboration behavior way included two different collaboration ways. In the experiment process,the authors set particular context,influencing factors and collaboration point of primary loops of Steam Generator Tube Rupture( SGTR) accident. The collaboration time and error probability of each type of collaboration are obtained by the simulated experiment,better team collaboration way for each collaboration type and the performance of each kind of collaboration way are also obtained.
出处 《南华大学学报(社会科学版)》 2015年第6期8-12,共5页 Journal of University of South China(Social Science Edition)
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"大规模数字化控制系统中人的认知行为研究" "数字化工业系统人因可靠性分析方法研究"资助(71071051 71371070) 湖南省自然科学基金项目"基于人因可靠性的核电厂数字化主控室人机界面布局优化模型研究"资助(14JJ7046) 南华大学科研支撑项目"基于人因可靠性的数字化人机界面布局优化方法研究"资助(2012XQD54)
关键词 核电厂主控室 协作方式 性能 main control room of nuclear power plant collaboration way performance
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1于千雅.班组安全管理以及实行安全管理模式的探讨[J].品牌,2014(9):74-75. 被引量:1
  • 2霍妍,毛楠.发电厂班组建设考评系统开发设计[J].电子技术与软件工程,2015(16):81-81. 被引量:1
  • 3刘永欣,王含柏.雷达管制班组协作模型[J].中国民航大学学报,2014,32(4):5-8. 被引量:3
  • 4Y H J Chang, A Mosleh. Cognitive modeling and dynam- ic prohahilis|ie simulation of operaling crew resl)onse to complex system accidents: Part 1: Overview of tile IDAC Model [ J ]. Reliahilily Engineering & System Satbty, 2007,92(8) :997-1013.
  • 5Y H J Chang, A Mosleh. Cognitive ,nodeling and dynam- ic probabilistic simulation of operating crew response to complex system aceidems. Part 2: IDAC performanee in- fluencing factors model [ J ]. Reliability Engineering & System Saf~ty, 2007,92 ( 8 ) : 1014-1040.
  • 6Y H J Chang, A Mosleh. Cognitive modeling and dynam-ic probabilistic simulation of operating crew response to complex system accidents: Part 3: IDAC operator re- sponse model[ J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safe- ty, 2007,92 ( 8 ) : 1041-1060.
  • 7Yung-Hsien Chang. Cognitive modeling and dynamic prob- abilistic simulation of operating crew response to complex system accident (ADA-IDACrew) [ D ]. Doctoral thesis, Department of materi'als and nuclear engineering, 1999.
  • 8Malone T B, M Kirkpatrick, et al. Human factors evalua- tion of control room design and operator performance atthree mile island-2 [ M ]. Nuclear Regulatory commission, 1979.
  • 9Kecklund L J, O Svenson. Human errors and work per- fonnance in a nuclear power plan control room: associa- tion with work-related factors and behavioral coping [ J ]. Reliability engineering and system safety, 1997 ( 56 ) : 5-15.
  • 10Swain A, and H E Guttmann. Handbook of human relia- bility analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant ap- plications [ M ]. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1983.

二级参考文献12

  • 1MINSKY M.A Frame Work for Representing Knowledge.Winston P,The Theory of Computer Vision[M] .New York:McGraw-Hill,1975.
  • 2INOUE S,AOYAMA H,KAGEYAMA K,et al.Task Analysis for Safety Assessment in En-Route Air Traffic Control[C] //Proceedings 13th International Symposium Aviation Psychology.Oklahoma,2005:253-258.
  • 3FURUTA K,KONDO S.Impact of group organization on human reliability[J] .Reliab Eng SystSaf,1992,38:193-198.
  • 4UJITA H,RYUTARO K,YOSHIMURA S.An approach for evaluating expert performance in emergency situations[J] .Reliab Eng Syst Saf 47,1995,47:163-173.
  • 5SEBOK A.Team performance in process control:influences of interface design and staffing levels[J] .Ergonomics,2000,43:1210-1236.
  • 6WELLENS A R.Group Situation Awareness and Distributed Decision Making:From Military to Civilian Applications[C] //Castellan NJ Jr(ed)Individual and Group Decision Making.Lawrence Erlbaum,Mahwah,1993:267-291.
  • 7ENDSLEY M R,JONES W M.A Model of Inter-and Intra-Team Situational Awareness:Implications for Design,Training and Measurement[C] //In:McNeese M,Salas E,Endsley M (eds) New Trends in Cooperative Activities:Understanding System Dynamics in Complex.Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.2001:46-68.
  • 8TUOMELA R,MILLERK.We-lntentions[J] .Philos Stud,1988,53:367-389.
  • 9KANNO T.The Notion of Sharedness Based on Mutual Belief[C] //Proceedings 12th International Conference Human-Computer Interaction.Beijing,2007:1347-1351.
  • 10系统安全评价与预测[M]. 冶金工业出版社, 2005.系统安全评价与预测[M]冶金工业出版社,2005.

共引文献2

同被引文献3

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部