摘要
文章以相邻语对的非合意回答为切入点,概括并总结了相邻语对中非合意回答的特点,并以此为基础,衡量受试者在相邻语对中做出非合意回答时采用的语用策略。研究采用实验手段,选用了提供—拒绝、要求—拒绝和抱怨—否认三类相邻语对,通过录音、转写、打分等方式,对38名受试者在不同相邻语对第一部分的具体语境中做出非合意回答时所采用的语用策略进行打分,在运用SPSS对受试者的CET4成绩与实验得分的相关性进行科学分析后,得出两者并无显著相关性的结论。
This paper,based on the previous research on adjacency pairs,summarizes the characteristics of dispreferred responses of adjacency pairs and studies the pragmatic strategies employed in making dispreferred responses. Research is carried out by choosing three different kinds of adjacency pairs to score 38 subjects on their strategies in each given context. Moreover,SPSS is employed to analyze the correlation between the subjects' scores of CET4 and their scores in the experiment,from which the conclusion is drawn that there is no significant correlation between them.
出处
《忻州师范学院学报》
2015年第6期54-57,共4页
Journal of Xinzhou Teachers University
关键词
相邻语对
非合意
英语水平
相关性
adjacency pairs
dispreferrence
English level
correlation