期刊文献+

刑事诉讼中被告人亲属拒绝出庭权刍议 被引量:2

On the Defendants' Relatives' Refusal to Appear in Court in Criminal Procedure
下载PDF
导出
摘要 2012年修改后的刑事诉讼法在细化规定了强制证人出庭作证的同时,首次突破性地规定了关于被告人亲属拒绝出庭权的条款。然而新的规定显得较为粗放,对于亲属拒绝出庭权的行使主体、行使条件以及具体权能均没有明确规定。借鉴两大法系主要国家中关于近亲属拒证权制度之规定,结合我国的司法实践,应对近亲属拒证权行使的主体范围、行使时间、主要权能和程序保障等予以明晰,以进一步完善我国刑事诉讼中的被告人亲属拒证权制度。 The China Criminal Procedure Law, which was revised in 2012, refined the rules of compelling witnesses to appear in court to testify and first got breakthrough in the provisions about the defendants' relatives, refusal to appear in court. However, the new regulations seem so extensive that the exercise of the right, the exercise conditions and the specific capacity are not clearly defined. With the reference of the concerned rules in two law systems, which are about close relatives' right of refusal, and according to China's judicial practice, this paper puts forward that the range of subjects, the time of implementing, the functions and procedure have to be specified so as to improve the system defendants' relatives' refusal to testify in Chinese criminal procedure.
作者 郭锴
出处 《铁道警察学院学报》 2015年第6期90-95,共6页 Journal of Railway Police College
关键词 刑事诉讼 近亲属 拒证权 criminal procedure close relative refusal to testify
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1龙宗智.本月评点:中国作证制度之三大怪现状评析[J].中国律师,2001(1):66-68. 被引量:83
  • 2雷小政.在夫妻间构建一道拒证特权的“栅栏”[N].法制日报,2004-06-10.
  • 3[法]孟德斯鸠.论法的精神(下册)[M].张雁深,译.北京:商务印书馆,1963.
  • 4高忠智.关国证据法新解--相关证据及其排除规则[M].北京:法律出版社,2004:137.
  • 5崔敏.刑事诉讼与证据适用[M].北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,2010:51,55,67.
  • 6[美]迈克尔.H.格莱姆.联邦证据规则[M].北京:法律出版社,1999:159.
  • 7王剑虹.亲属拒证特权研究[D].北京:法律出版社,2010:36,44,86.
  • 8[德]克劳恩.罗科信.德国刑事诉讼法[M].吴丽琪,译.北京:法律出版社,2003:243.

共引文献86

同被引文献7

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部