期刊文献+

民事诉讼的举证期限问题再探讨 被引量:1

The Time Limit for Adducing Evidence in Civil Action
下载PDF
导出
摘要 现行《民事诉讼法》第65条对举证期限设立了逾期举证导致证据失权的制度,而新施行的《司法解释》第102条通过但书形式将逾期举证导致证据失权制度进行了限定,致使理论认识和司法实践出现异同。通过对相关法律条款和司法解释的对应分析,结合举证期限制度的应用实践,提出构建逾期举证制度的配套机制,以期使逾期举证制度在司法体系下有合适法理依据和可行实践空间。 Article 65 of the Law of Civil Procedure, which is currently in effect, has established the evidence invalidity system if one infringes the time limit for adducing evidence. While the Interpretation of the Civil Procedure Law implemented in February 4, 2015 has eliminated the force of proof-right-losing system through the proviso which is in Article 102. The interpretation has made people confused in theoretical understanding and judicial practice. We will put forward a necessary mechanism combining some related law regulations and proof invalidity system in legal practice in order that the system of time limit for adducing evidence can be suitable to the theory and practice of the legal system in China.
机构地区 青岛大学法学院
出处 《东方论坛(青岛大学学报)》 2015年第6期85-90,共6页 Eastern Forum(JOURNAL OF QINGDAO UNIVERSITY)
关键词 民事诉讼 举证期限 证据失权 诉讼效率 civil action time limit for adducing evidence invalidity of evidence efficiency of lawsuit
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献23

共引文献46

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部