期刊文献+

中职学生的群体偏好:基于社会认同理论的分析 被引量:2

Inter-group Preference among Second Vocational School Students: Based on Social Identity Theory
原文传递
导出
摘要 学术界对群体地位与群际偏好之关系的争议由来已久,观点分歧主要基于社会认同理论或系统公正理论的不同解读。文章以广东省一所中职学校为个案,证实社会认同理论更适用于解释低地位群体的群际偏好差异,并在此基础上提出"自证预言"效应的观点,以回应两大理论学派尚未达成共识之处。未来研究可尝试关注群体心理现象的社会结构根源,进一步探讨制度与权力对群体意识的影响。 There's been a long academic controversy over the relationship between group status and intergroup preference. The differences are mainly based on the interpretations of social identity theory or system justice theory. Taking a vocational school in Guangdong province as an example, this article proved that social identity theory is more applicable to the interpretation of intergroup preference differences of low social status groups, and proposed "self-fulfilling prophecy" in response to the controversy between two major theoretical schools. In the future research, the social structural roots of psychological phenomena are expected to be focused to explore the impact of the system and power.
作者 王卓琳
出处 《教育学术月刊》 北大核心 2016年第1期35-40,共6页 Education Research Monthly
关键词 中职学生 群体偏好 社会认同理论 系统公正理论 自证预言 the second vocational school students group preference social identity theory system justice theory self-fulfilling prophecy
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Rubin,M.& M.Hewstone.Social identity theory's self-esteem hypothesis:A review and some suggestions for clarification[J].Personality and Social Psychology Review,1998,2(1):40-62.
  • 2Henry,PJ&A.Saul.The Development of System Justification in the Developing Wodd[J].Soeial Justice Research,2006,19(3):365-378.
  • 3Tajfel,H&J.C.Turner.An integrative theory of intergroup eonfliet [A].The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations[C].Monterey, CA:BrooksPCole, 1979:33-47.
  • 4Turner,J.C.,R. J. Brown&H.Tajfel,Soeial comparison and group interest in ingroup favouritism [J].European Journal of Social Psychology, 1979(9): 187-204.
  • 5Jost,J,B.Pelham,B.Sheldon& O.Sullivan.Social inequality and the reduction of ideological dissonance on behalf of the system: evidence of enhanced system justification among the disadvantaged[J]. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2003,33(1):13-36.
  • 6Jost,J.,M.Carvallo&B.Pelham.Non-conscious forms of system justification: cognitive, affective, and behavioral preferences for higher status groups[J]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,2002,38(6): 586-602.
  • 7Jost,J.&M.Banaji.The role of stereotyping in system- justification and the production of false consciousness [J]. British Journal of Social Psychology, 1994, 33(8):1-27.
  • 8Rubin,M,&M.Hewstone.Social Identity, System Justification, and Social Dominance: Commentary on Reieher,Jost et al.,and Sidanius et al[J].Politieal Psychology,2004,25(6):823-844.
  • 9李琼,刘力.低地位群体的外群体偏好[J].心理科学进展,2011,19(7):1061-1068. 被引量:28
  • 10Hornsey,M.J.,R.Spears,I.Cremers&M.Hogg.Relations between high and low- power groups: the importance of legitimacy[J].Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,2003, 29(5): 216-227.

二级参考文献55

  • 1连淑芳.内-外群体偏爱的内隐效应实验研究[J].心理科学,2005,28(1):93-95. 被引量:30
  • 2张莹瑞,佐斌.社会认同理论及其发展[J].心理科学进展,2006,14(3):475-480. 被引量:648
  • 3Jenkins, Richard.: Social Identity, London: Routledge, 2004.
  • 4Tajfel, H.: Social Identity and Intergroup Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
  • 5Billig, M. and Tajfel, H.: Social Categorization and Similarity in Intergroup Behaviour, European Journal of Social Psychology, Vol.3, No.1, pp.27-52, 1973.
  • 6Tajfel, H. and Turner, J. C. : The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior, in Worchel, S. and Austine, W. G (eds) : Psychology of lntergroupRelations (2nd), Chicago: Nelson-Hall, 1986.
  • 7Hogg, M. A and Abrams, D.: Social Identifications: A Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations and Group Processes, London and New York: Routledge, 1998.
  • 8Jost, J. T.: Outgroup Favoritism and the Theory of System Justification: An Experimental Paradigm for Investigating the Effects of Socio-economic Success on Stereotype Content, in Moskowitz, G (ed.): Cognitive Social Psychology: The Princeton Symposium on the Legacy and Future of Social Cognition, Mahwah, N. J.: Erlbaum, 2001.
  • 9Mullen, B.; Brown, R. and Smith, C.: Ingroup Bias as a Function of Salience, Relevance and Status: An Integration, European Journal of Social Psychology, Voi.22, No.2, pp. 103-122, 1992.
  • 10Jost, J. T. and Burgess, D.: Attitudinal Ambivalence and the Conflict between Group and System Justification Motives in Low Status Groups, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol.26, No.3:293-305, 2000.

共引文献46

同被引文献9

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部